For Better or For Worse by Lynn Johnston for July 14, 2016

Could be raccoons or opossums in that tree, girl.

For the boys’ sake, I hope she doesn’t catch them.I’m sure she will, but, for their sakes, I hope…

If she does it will be Lawrence’s fault since they are his friends.

That’s enough for tonight, guys. There’s always tomorrow. She’s not going anywhere. By the way … you men haters should know that it’s NATURAL for boys for be inquisitive of girls at that age. Get over yourselves.

Look at her ’80s hair.

Granted most of this is in fun, but how would it be for Michael if his son knew what he was doing?

No little rats in the tree !!!! 8^(

The jig is up…well,almost

It wasn’t a real spoiler. The real spoiler was already posted yesterday.

Hurl a book at it and watch the mountain of monkeys come tumbling out of it. Lol!

Oh,oh there’s a gonna be trouble…lol

And it is only natural that girls are inquizative about boys and young men – especially young men….

@summerdog. Oh,come on! I just spoke in general terms.We all know they’ll be caught and punished.Thats a given. When, by whom,terms of punishment,these things are yet to be revealed.I wouldn’t dream of letting the cat out of the bag!

We’re on a collision course with WACKINESS!

You think only the boys are curious at that age? Back when I was that age, my sister’s friends would strut their stuff any time they thought I might be watching them and then giggle amongst themselves when my package was obvious. Nothin’ dirty goin’ on….. Just a little innocent growing up without adult hang-ups getting in the way.

And let’s not forget that everyone here is a voyeur; even though it’s only a comic strip.

@rayloholdridge. It’s a send-up of the movie “Back to the future”.and pretty funny at that.

@Petemejia77. You ain’t seen nothin yet!

Who made you the big GoComics Sherriff?

Actually, it turned out that there were no spoilers, just speculation and made up stuff.