The coin is some kind of souvenir token. Those early coins did not have a date. Even if they did. It would not be 64 but VXIV .
Called it.
I tank at roman numerals. VXIV is what number?
I believe he meant to say LXIV which would be 64.
rsketch, you are correct LXIV us 64. Not a big deal the wrong numerals were posted first though.
Left to prowl the shop, he will find Walt’s cane.
cue the Pyle clan coming in to hock the gold cane
Skeezix getting senile?
Actual Roman coins may not have had a year on them but it’s expedient to the story to pretend that they did and we are obviously here for the cane. The coin was just a device for the author to get Skeezix to the shop.
DaJellyBelly almost 8 years ago
The coin is some kind of souvenir token. Those early coins did not have a date. Even if they did. It would not be 64 but VXIV .
sarazan7 almost 8 years ago
Called it.
Lyons Group, Inc. almost 8 years ago
I tank at roman numerals. VXIV is what number?
Russell Sketchley Premium Member almost 8 years ago
I believe he meant to say LXIV which would be 64.
mcmissy almost 8 years ago
rsketch, you are correct LXIV us 64. Not a big deal the wrong numerals were posted first though.
nlevine almost 8 years ago
Left to prowl the shop, he will find Walt’s cane.
roohey almost 8 years ago
cue the Pyle clan coming in to hock the gold cane
3pibgorn9 almost 8 years ago
Skeezix getting senile?
Neil Wick almost 8 years ago
Actual Roman coins may not have had a year on them but it’s expedient to the story to pretend that they did and we are obviously here for the cane. The coin was just a device for the author to get Skeezix to the shop.