Ziggy by Tom Wilson & Tom II for March 29, 2016

From the New Department.

Why not? According to one analysis using the Flesch-Kincaid test, Trump speaks on a third grade level.

Considering the vocabulary used by the candidates is geared toward a third-grade reading level and comprehension, how can it not be for children?

The … goes on to say “or adults”.

Never mind the reading level, trying to explain to the youngest children what was meant by their stupid smutty remarks aimed at each other, or why they would say such things, should be downright embarrassing (actually at any age)..Imagine our president treating leaders of other countries like that.

Better send the candidates home, then.

not suitable for children – why? is it because they are so ‘childish’?so far the quality of the debates and debaters is two steps below the ‘reality’ shows and their so called ‘reality’

Warning: The comments on this strip may not be suitable reading for children …

Monkey say as monkeys do…

Just my opinion, but it could be that the practical utility of debates has been exceeded (duh?). Seems like 2-3 is enough to reveal the candidates’ improvisational skills, etc, to the voters. The rest is just theater. Town hall type events are much more useful to me…..the candidate and the voters.

These days it doesn’t seem suitable for anybody.

It may be new, but it isn’t news. And they surely aren’t suitable for intelligent adults, either.

Wouldn’t want my grandkids thinking they could act that way.