Michael Ramirez for November 17, 2015

Keep spouting your beliefs in the face of all evidence you useless head of state. While you wring your hands over Global Warming and stick those same hands in the pockets of hard working taxpayers to bail our your cronies.

Your obvious nearsightedness will be attributed to your party and make it that much harder for us to get stuck with another liberal doofus.

Even a neutered dog can still bite.

And he should have said, “Mission Accomplished!”?

“there are none so blind as those who will not see”…-Today in the internet news…ex-CIA chief condemned Obama’s ISIS policies, “it isn’t working” and ISIS is expanding. Friday Paris and soon, Washington, D.C.-Obama displayed anger at the suggestion of a tiny minority of congressmen that the USA should rescue Christian refugees….www.cnsnews.com “So Far: Syrian Refugees in U.S. Include 2,098 Muslims, 53 Christians”-Is Obama anti-Christian? Muslims are so full of hate, the targeted Christians, running from ISIS violence, are just as threatened in the refugee camps! My Bible says we Christians are to do good first to our brothers and sisters in Christ, then to the unsaved. That should be America’s priority, to save Christians first, and to exercise great caution to the Trojan Horse terrorists trying to invade via “refugee status.”

@jack75287 – We all like to think of ourselves as moderates but I am a Social liberal and an Economic conservative. I am one of the few Republicans who is actually in favor of a smaller government.

Most Republicans, as soon as they get into office, want just as big a government as the Democrats but they want it to be involved in setting rules about: Marriage, Abortion, Drug use, along with a lot of other nonsense that prevents US citizens from pursuing happiness as they would like too. I have no tolerance for their idiocy either.

I truly want less Federal Government: Less Federal restrictions, Less Federal dictates, Less Federal control over local matters. The way the Constitution was written before Supreme Courts decided that they had the right to do all this extra control under the commerce clause.

He said it, but not in the context that terrorism all over the world is contained.

Also, am I the only one seeing in the news that all Paris and Canada plan on doing is air strikes? So if our air strikes aren’t working according to all the right wingers, what makes anyone else think that air strikes from them is going to be more effective? Please explain.

And of course, a Syrian terrorist slips into France, a foreign country with a strange language, and immediately sets up a successful multi-pronged terror plot…

Hillary is dumber than dirt? That’s your answer. Yeah the FBI investigation that’s been going on for months now and no charges. You might of well have just commented “I know you are but what am I”

The actions taken by the US and Britain since World War II have created the unstable situation that increases terrorism. Drawing lines around “countries” without regard to how the people of the region consider themselves as groups. 1953 – CIA and MI6 overthrow the elected Iranian prime minister because he wants to nationalize their oil to keep profits for the Iranian people. This leads to the hostage crisis in 1979. 1992: as Sec. of Defense, Cheney said we shouldn’t take out Saddam; reasons given were pretty accurate since they match what has happened since Saddam deposed. Drone strikes and other bombings kill innocents including children and they are referred to as “collateral damage”. War crimes committed, violating Geneva Convention and Bush calls the prisoners, many completely innocent, enemy combatants.-Yes Ramirez, actions taken by the US result in potential terrorism in the US.

@NightGaunt & Bar Pluc – You two don’t get to determine the minimum requirements for being a liberal OR conservative. You each seem to have your own facist litmus test for what one has to believe in order to meet your standards and I don’t agree. There are other areas of Social justice that I support that don’t have to do with Robbing one citizen to pay for another citizen’s bread.

I support: Gay Marriage, Abortion rights, Right to Privacy, any constitutional clause that limits the Federal government to impose it’s will on the ordinary citizen. In my book that is plenty liberal enough.

I’m a fiscal conservative because I don’t think the government has any business deciding how much a man (or woman) can make before they become an easy target for government sanctioned theft. You call it social justice and I call it looting.

Could this ’toon by Ramirez be a pretext for RWNJs to vent/display their ignorance?

isis is contained — to earth

It’s clear. The most important thing to do when ISIS attacks Paris is for Ramirez to attack Obama. That’ll stop ’em.