So here we have two hypothesis, each is refuted by the opposite side by quoting and citing more hypothesis. One is asking you to believe the hypothesis of hypotherical theories, waiting to be disproved. The other is asking you to have faith, which in essence is also hypotherical, and believe that God is in charge. You know what; it’s not science, but I’ll go and find out for my self, if Miami is under water, I’ll believe the scientists hypothesis, if not I’ll believe in God.
Most of the scientists brought in to build the bomb in the Manhattan project were practicing Jews, which is why, including Einstein, they left Germany. Their skill sets got them into the U.S., while many others were rejected and sent back.
Mike, isn’t the guy in the big white hat a man with a degree in Chemistry? Doesn’t that make him a scientist? I’m pretty sure he believes in God. Might not be the God you believe in.
I thought most scientists understand the causes of anthropogenic global warming. Many non-scientists trust these experts rather than believe in them. Climate Change denialists believe there is no anthropogenic climate change because they cannot provide sound science behind their beliefs. They base their opinions on ‘belief’, not on ‘understanding’. World of difference between these notions.Many scientists may believe in a higher-power or deity, but as many may have a non-belief in a supranatural power ( i.e atheism), which is different to a belief that there is no supranatural power/deity/higher-power.
Ramirez has trouble with these definitions and conflates them, as do many posters on this thread.
The Pope believes in a god but, as a scientist with a masters in Chemistry, understands the science behind anthropogenic climate change.
NeedaChuckle Premium Member over 8 years ago
Gods and science are NOT mutually exclusive. I say Gods because there have been a whole slew of them.
HabaneroBuck over 8 years ago
The Vatican division of science also has a telescope out in the Arizona desert nicknamed “Lucifer”. Looking out at the stars for something….
6.6TA over 8 years ago
Have a look at Dr. Carson. But not in Ramirez’ cartoons. He doesn’t do Republicans.
lonecat over 8 years ago
This is very confused, but what else would you expect from Ramirez. He doesn’t understand science, but I fear he doesn’t understand religion, either.
canFunny over 8 years ago
So here we have two hypothesis, each is refuted by the opposite side by quoting and citing more hypothesis. One is asking you to believe the hypothesis of hypotherical theories, waiting to be disproved. The other is asking you to have faith, which in essence is also hypotherical, and believe that God is in charge. You know what; it’s not science, but I’ll go and find out for my self, if Miami is under water, I’ll believe the scientists hypothesis, if not I’ll believe in God.
DGH10 over 8 years ago
All Catholics should reply to every insult from a FOX NEWS comment with a hardy “We will no longer buy from your sponsors”.
oneoldhat over 8 years ago
pope and science see urban vlll
Dtroutma over 8 years ago
Most of the scientists brought in to build the bomb in the Manhattan project were practicing Jews, which is why, including Einstein, they left Germany. Their skill sets got them into the U.S., while many others were rejected and sent back.
Kylop over 8 years ago
Mike, isn’t the guy in the big white hat a man with a degree in Chemistry? Doesn’t that make him a scientist? I’m pretty sure he believes in God. Might not be the God you believe in.
Ivan Araque over 8 years ago
One despicable comparison, Ramirez, go back to bury your head in the sand, you ostrich.
markjoseph125 over 8 years ago
Hey, for once I agree with Ramirez—ignorance and religion go hand-in-hand
OmqR-IV.0 over 8 years ago
I thought most scientists understand the causes of anthropogenic global warming. Many non-scientists trust these experts rather than believe in them. Climate Change denialists believe there is no anthropogenic climate change because they cannot provide sound science behind their beliefs. They base their opinions on ‘belief’, not on ‘understanding’. World of difference between these notions.Many scientists may believe in a higher-power or deity, but as many may have a non-belief in a supranatural power ( i.e atheism), which is different to a belief that there is no supranatural power/deity/higher-power.
Ramirez has trouble with these definitions and conflates them, as do many posters on this thread.
The Pope believes in a god but, as a scientist with a masters in Chemistry, understands the science behind anthropogenic climate change.