Doesn’t matter in any case. Since she did not actually see him steal money and he never told her in confidence that he did it, she is in a position no different from anyone else who suspects that someone committed a crime. She has no legal or ethical obligation to “rat” on him, since she has absolutely no evidence that he committed a crime. From an ethical point of view, than, she should listen to her “demon” and not call the police. No one is obligated to “rat out” anyone – either family or friends – because they “suspect” them of something. This well-meaning but completely mistaken “ethical principle” has been the tedious plot of a far too many sitcom episodes.
Rod Gonzalez about 9 years ago
The age old battle between the Superego and the Id.
And of course, the Ego (in this case, Lil) is in the middle.
battle of plattsburgh about 9 years ago
Unlike Lil, I have complete faith in the integrity of Chubby.
What? Me worried ? about 9 years ago
by the Steve Miller Band ?
Jck123 about 9 years ago
Don’t let any pesky details get in your way, like not having any facts to begin with.
2599745 about 9 years ago
Are the Benders filling in for Scancarelli? Zzzzzzzzzzz More action to follow.
Auntie Socialist about 9 years ago
Doesn’t matter in any case. Since she did not actually see him steal money and he never told her in confidence that he did it, she is in a position no different from anyone else who suspects that someone committed a crime. She has no legal or ethical obligation to “rat” on him, since she has absolutely no evidence that he committed a crime. From an ethical point of view, than, she should listen to her “demon” and not call the police. No one is obligated to “rat out” anyone – either family or friends – because they “suspect” them of something. This well-meaning but completely mistaken “ethical principle” has been the tedious plot of a far too many sitcom episodes.