Matt Davies for October 07, 2014

Actually, MSNBC has been pretty good about getting the truth out there (including showing the fearmongering on the other cable channels and debunking it). Rachel Maddow’s explanation was clear, concise, and accurate; and she talked to actual doctors and epidemiologists instead of Republican politicians with a beef against government competence.

As a Canadian I must agree…….

How sad and pathetic it is that a news organization with connections around the world can’t find something to talk about that doesn’t boil down to THE SKY IS FALLLLLING!

MSNBC does declare it’s shows as COMMENTARIES, not “news”. I don’t always agree with Rachel, or other “liberals” on these commentary shows, but overall they’re pretty good at at least getting the FACTS out.

Watched a few minutes of Fox “news” yesterday, and a bit more CNN, and watched ABC & NBC “news”.It was interesting that there was more “commentary” on CNN and Fox than news, and ABC and NBC “news” wasn’t much better.

CHANGE THE CHANNEL!!!!

@TripelAxel yeah sure, better consider your source, Politico,is a conservative organ of propaganda a litte less stinky than Fox.

All three are hardly worth watching. Obviously Faux News is the worst with nothing more than lies and propaganda, but also has the least amount of viewers. The other two are not as bad, but…… BBC News is the most accurate and not tied to sponsors or commercialism.