The incident referred to here was not “friendly fire” Friendly fire is the term used when someone on your side accidentally hits your or one of your fellow soldiers. The # who did this did not do it by accident.
There’s some truth to what he’s saying. I think it’s more of the Government as a whole letting those folks down, but Obama and his staff are part of the problem.
herdleader53 over 9 years ago
The incident referred to here was not “friendly fire” Friendly fire is the term used when someone on your side accidentally hits your or one of your fellow soldiers. The # who did this did not do it by accident.
woodwork over 9 years ago
Nam…deja’ vu all over again
griffthegreat over 9 years ago
There is NO such thing!
warjoski Premium Member over 9 years ago
@ Zuhlamon
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/04/how-white-house-military-failed-fort-hood-victims
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/members-congress-demand-obama-administration-classify-ft-hood/story?id=18493746
There’s some truth to what he’s saying. I think it’s more of the Government as a whole letting those folks down, but Obama and his staff are part of the problem.
braindead Premium Member over 9 years ago
Maybe Ramirez can describe what our mission in Afghanistan is….
Dtroutma over 9 years ago
Just a note on something caught briefly on the news, how many Israeli military casualties in Gaza, were actually from “friendly fire”??
Ninjaboss13 over 9 years ago
Finally someone who has sense, and can prove it with facts.