In the Bleachers by Ben Zaehringer for February 13, 2010

  1. Missing large
    Edcole1961  over 14 years ago

    If they had that test 40 years ago, no one would have heard of Wilt Chamberlain.

     •  Reply
  2. Grog poop
    GROG Premium Member over 14 years ago

    That’s an eye-bulging revelation.

    A

     •  Reply
  3. Jerry lakehead
    jtviper7  over 14 years ago

    Looks like a speed freak to me…A real tweeker.

     •  Reply
  4. Phonepic3altered4
    yyyguy  over 14 years ago

    as in: didn’t keep faith with the marriage vows. hence, infidelity. simple, eh?

     •  Reply
  5. Artrazz 2
    fredbuhl  over 14 years ago

    Will there be enough left to form a league?

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    JamesBrown  over 14 years ago

    infidelity= 1.a. Unfaithfulness to a sexual partner, especially a spouse. b. An act of sexual unfaithfulness.

    Lack of fidelity or loyalty. Lack of religious belief.

    You decide who fits this bill!!!

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    mamajock  over 14 years ago

    Actually, a single person really can’t be unfaithful. He hasn’t promised himself (or been promised) to someone in particular. So Wilt - vigorously playing the field - had no fidelity problems.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From In the Bleachers