Ted Rall for July 30, 2014
Transcript:
GOP Fights poverty. Man 1: I could give you money. Man 2: Awesome! Man 1: But where would you be next week? Man 2: Right back here? Man 1: Yes! We need a permanent solution- not a band-aid for poverty. I'm giving money to this random rich guy. He'll spend it on luxury goods. Luxury goods makers will see an uptick in their sales. They'll hire someone. That someone will spend more money. Man 2: What about me? Man 1: Maybe she'll give you money.
douthett72 over 9 years ago
Got to college or a trade school and after you graduate, they might hire you
Jason Allen over 9 years ago
Except the luxury goods makers will probably hire someone in China, not the US.
WestNYC Premium Member over 9 years ago
There is no permanent solution to poverty. There always has been and always will be rich and poor people under all types of governments, economic systems, etc. Some countries (like Canada and Singapore) are just better at hiding poverty from plain sight.
William Bednar Premium Member over 9 years ago
Yep, and here we are back where we started. Ten years go by and the same guy is back on the same corner still begging for cash. Only this time the guy has a PHD and a one million dollar student load debt! Can you help him out? Please??
Cerabooge over 9 years ago
Right on target, except for one thing; there are a lot of Democrats who are just as zealous in serving their rich masters. Alas, I don’t know how you could illustrate that in just a few letters or an image.
braindead Premium Member over 9 years ago
The random rich guy will also give bribes campaign contributions to the Congressman. And a ‘job’ as a lobbyist when he leaves Congress.
TripleAxel over 9 years ago
Note that “giving money” to the random rich guy is code for “not taking as much money from him as I usually do.” Also, I notice that the cartoon does not address the valid point that throwing money at poor people has never solved the problem of poverty – more often it creates a subculture of dependency among a significant percentage those who receive government benefits.
Lord Gaga over 9 years ago
So, trickle-around then? Whatever you call it, we’ve had over three decades of decline in working class wages and lifestyles that proves it doesn’t work. Not for the rest of us, anyway.
Cerabooge over 9 years ago
jrmerm: “Political systems, not economic ones…”. Politics and economics are inextricably linked. Or are you going to claim that tax policy that punishes workers, rewards Wall Street gamblers, and favors giant corporations over small business, is not political? Or that the whole post-WWII policy of the U.S., using our military to expand the power of business, had nothing to do with economics? Or hell, _O_peration _I_raqi _L_iberation?