Michael Ramirez for January 15, 2010

  1. F22 rotation1
    petergrt  over 14 years ago

    Tax success, subsidize failure - 0bamanomics

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    kennethcwarren64  over 14 years ago

    So it was Obama that sank the economy and put us in this mess?

    I don’t know why it is taking him so long to get out of this mess, especially with all of the help the Republicans are giving him.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    comYics  over 14 years ago

    Nice note on that floaty.

     •  Reply
  4. Reagan ears
    d_legendary1  over 14 years ago

    He forgot to add that the Democrats want to give your hard earned money to lazy people in the ghetto and want to take your gun away. Ohhhh and don’t forget abortions they love killing babies!!!

     •  Reply
  5. And you wonder why
    Kylop  over 14 years ago

    On the foreground anvil it reads “taxes” and “Re-something-tions”

    Even with my contact lenses I can’t make that out. What does it say?

     •  Reply
  6. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 14 years ago

    Reaganomics took all the stop signs off the “banking” industry and Wall Street, so let’s get them all off our surface roads too, dang “regulations”!

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    agent.007  over 14 years ago

    No, Ken, Obama didn’t start the recession, but charlatans like Dodd and Frank opposed reining in Freddie and Fannie and told Bush in what great shape they were. And those two pals of Obama are actually writing laws to get us out of the hole!

    With big Democrat majorities in Congress, why exactly does Obama need Republican help? And, his notion of borrowing our way back to prosperity is transparent baloney. No, wait, Obama is currently showing how much he dislikes transparency.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    PlainBill  over 14 years ago

    Agent, perhaps you should study history, specifically the Great Depression. It is generally conceded that while Roosevelt’s programs provided some help, it wasn’t until WWII that the nation REALLY recovered.

    How did WWII end the depression? Massive Federal spending programs to build the weapons necessary to fight a modern war. How were those programs funded? By BORROWING!!!

     •  Reply
  9. F22 rotation1
    petergrt  over 14 years ago

    “How did WWII end the depression? Massive Federal spending programs to build the weapons necessary to fight a modern war.”

    Straight out of Communist text book - Political Economics, making a case why Capitalism / Imperialism needs war.

    It is of course a total nonsense.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    agent.007  over 14 years ago

    Well, Plainbill, four years of no new civilian autos plus restrictions on home-building and a host of other things people wanted might have had something to do with the postwar boom. Moreover, the war borrowing was from Americans themselves, not from foreign creditors who too frequently do not wish us well. Finally, we have been going into debt in recent times for a lot longer than the duration of WWII.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    oneoldhat  over 14 years ago

    dtrout yes great reagan supporters like Dodd and Frank opposed reining in Freddie and Fannie and pushed cria

     •  Reply
  12. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 14 years ago

    Talking about getting OUT of a the current depression, certain folks always overlook that it was deregulation, and the “fee-wheeling market”, that got us into the first one, AND THIS ONE! Trusting the market is trusting to crooks and morons- deja-vu all over again.

     •  Reply
  13. Reagan ears
    d_legendary1  over 14 years ago

    WWII Slowed down economic recovery in the u.s. It didn’t help get out of a recession. If it did then Iraq and Afghanistan were real economy boosters.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    Gladius  over 14 years ago

    The wars are not economically comparable d. The economy in WWII was partially government controlled. Long term, this causes problems. However, when fighting a war on the scale of WWII it is necessary. Spending continued after the war because ordinary people had savings that they could not spend during the war. Also, military spending did not completely dry up due the growing Soviet threat. The other problem is that the federal debt before WWII was not the same relative size as it is now. There is quite a bit more to this if you have time to look into it.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Michael Ramirez