Once again folks, they are NOT recording conversations or “wire tapping”, they’re compiling phone numbers called, just like the Bush administration did! Interesting that when “General Bush” ran the war on terror (okay, everyone knows it was actually Cheney, Ashcroft, and Gonzales) it was all okey-dokey. Now that a guy actually going to the FISA courts is “worse”?? bullpucky (but the whole thing IS bullpucky granted by the “Patriot Act”.
I am now presumed guilty. With the amount of laws today, it is impossible to stay “legal”, therefore my government may surveil me.
The US Constitution, 4th Amendment (1791)The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
Dtroutma almost 11 years ago
Once again folks, they are NOT recording conversations or “wire tapping”, they’re compiling phone numbers called, just like the Bush administration did! Interesting that when “General Bush” ran the war on terror (okay, everyone knows it was actually Cheney, Ashcroft, and Gonzales) it was all okey-dokey. Now that a guy actually going to the FISA courts is “worse”?? bullpucky (but the whole thing IS bullpucky granted by the “Patriot Act”.
donotemailme almost 11 years ago
I am now presumed guilty. With the amount of laws today, it is impossible to stay “legal”, therefore my government may surveil me.
The US Constitution, 4th Amendment (1791)The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.