Problem is that you have to be arrested first. The scary part is that you could be arrested for anything (jay walking included) in order to get your DNA.
It was that notorious liberal, Antonin Scalia, who wrote the dissenting opinion in the Supreme Court case, siding with four liberal justices. It isn’t just the “coddling liberals” who find this decision outrageous.
Almost too many errors to count. The big one is that there have been a number of case where an ‘expert’ testified to a positive DNA match – and then was proven to have deliberately lied.
As far as Verizon, the articles have made it very clear that no conversations were monitored, they were looking at who called who.
d_legendary1 almost 11 years ago
Problem is that you have to be arrested first. The scary part is that you could be arrested for anything (jay walking included) in order to get your DNA.
WaitingMan almost 11 years ago
It was that notorious liberal, Antonin Scalia, who wrote the dissenting opinion in the Supreme Court case, siding with four liberal justices. It isn’t just the “coddling liberals” who find this decision outrageous.
rini1946 almost 11 years ago
I’m sorry but I see this in the long run catching criminals that have gotton away with a crime.
FourcentsSr almost 11 years ago
How convenient. And what is the difference?
Terrorists are not criminals? Which President can you assume would not do these things and how long have you assumed that? Guilty!
PlainBill almost 11 years ago
Almost too many errors to count. The big one is that there have been a number of case where an ‘expert’ testified to a positive DNA match – and then was proven to have deliberately lied.
As far as Verizon, the articles have made it very clear that no conversations were monitored, they were looking at who called who.
Dtroutma almost 11 years ago
1. DNA is the new “fingerprint”, and taking blood samples under “implied consent” on drunk driving suspects is far more invasive.
2. It’s also interesting how many people are being proven INNOCENT not guilty through DNA evidence.