I will say that Obama did win, but wow, someone got it wrong. Where did you get the “Romney behind by double digits” info? He was really close before this debate and continues to be in the lead on some and almost even in others. Which of the two had more time on the clock? Who ended up having the truth on Bengahzi corrected after the it was misrepresented by the moderator? The moderator tried to get Obama to stop, but he told her no, that he must finish, it was that important. You must have been whatching the debate that those who were asked by Jimmy Kimmel prior to it.
While the right-wing whining raises to cacophony, they don’t even listen to what their dude is SAYING!! (Let alone the fact that tapes, transcripts, and facts, consistently show Mitt just keeps trying to lie his way out of every situation, debate, or just his campaign appearances.)
PlainBill said, about 9 hours agoI find it hilarious. Romney’s lies are so blatant even the moderator reacted…….(end quote)-Romney has been proven the truthteller and Obama and the moderator who broke the rules and put herself into the “debate” are proven the liars. The transcript and video of Obama’s Rose garden speech prove that his words following mention of Iraq and Afghanistan were general and not specific for Benghazi….“no actS (plural) of terror” will ever shake the resolve of this nation…" .-Obama in that speech blamed the Video for “senseless violence” in Benghazi…in the 4th paragraph, and after speaking about 9/11/01 and the loss of American lives in Iraq and Afghanistan, in the 10 th paragraph Obama said (including every act of terror since 9/11/01) the words…“no actS of terror”…..-Then Obama led the 14 day campaign of blaming a 14-minute video for the Al Qaeda/no protests/no riots attacks (2) on 9/11/12 on the US consulate at Benghazi, killing 4 Americans who the Obama regime failed to protect.
I do not think he implied that Obama woke up and jumped on the plane, as much as he was saying the concern was not important enough to keep him from going to Vegas. Just as Obama appearently thinks generality is the equivelance of being specific in regards to the act of terror statement in the rose garden. This even happened to the moderator who changed her mind after the event. People want to make things into what they need at the moment. Obama has been hurt by what has gone on in this Benghazi debacle and he is trying to keep the damage to his election bid to a minimum.
lonecat over 11 years ago
What a nasty man Ramirez is.
PlainBill over 11 years ago
I find it hilarious. Romney’s lies are so blatant even the moderator reacted.
Mark Tretter over 11 years ago
Who in the world picks these moderators they’ve had in all the debates??
runar over 11 years ago
If Romney were to win, Ramirez would be out of his job because the only pencil in his drawer is labeled “Hate The Ni Obama”.
neuturn over 11 years ago
I will say that Obama did win, but wow, someone got it wrong. Where did you get the “Romney behind by double digits” info? He was really close before this debate and continues to be in the lead on some and almost even in others. Which of the two had more time on the clock? Who ended up having the truth on Bengahzi corrected after the it was misrepresented by the moderator? The moderator tried to get Obama to stop, but he told her no, that he must finish, it was that important. You must have been whatching the debate that those who were asked by Jimmy Kimmel prior to it.
Dtroutma over 11 years ago
While the right-wing whining raises to cacophony, they don’t even listen to what their dude is SAYING!! (Let alone the fact that tapes, transcripts, and facts, consistently show Mitt just keeps trying to lie his way out of every situation, debate, or just his campaign appearances.)
disgustedtaxpayer over 11 years ago
PlainBill said, about 9 hours agoI find it hilarious. Romney’s lies are so blatant even the moderator reacted…….(end quote)-Romney has been proven the truthteller and Obama and the moderator who broke the rules and put herself into the “debate” are proven the liars. The transcript and video of Obama’s Rose garden speech prove that his words following mention of Iraq and Afghanistan were general and not specific for Benghazi….“no actS (plural) of terror” will ever shake the resolve of this nation…" .-Obama in that speech blamed the Video for “senseless violence” in Benghazi…in the 4th paragraph, and after speaking about 9/11/01 and the loss of American lives in Iraq and Afghanistan, in the 10 th paragraph Obama said (including every act of terror since 9/11/01) the words…“no actS of terror”…..-Then Obama led the 14 day campaign of blaming a 14-minute video for the Al Qaeda/no protests/no riots attacks (2) on 9/11/12 on the US consulate at Benghazi, killing 4 Americans who the Obama regime failed to protect.
neuturn over 11 years ago
I do not think he implied that Obama woke up and jumped on the plane, as much as he was saying the concern was not important enough to keep him from going to Vegas. Just as Obama appearently thinks generality is the equivelance of being specific in regards to the act of terror statement in the rose garden. This even happened to the moderator who changed her mind after the event. People want to make things into what they need at the moment. Obama has been hurt by what has gone on in this Benghazi debacle and he is trying to keep the damage to his election bid to a minimum.