Clay Bennett by Clay Bennett

Clay Bennett

Comments (55) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. braindead08

    braindead08 GoComics PRO Member said, about 20 hours ago

    Religious ‘liberty’ now!


    Religious ‘liberty’ tomorrow!


    Religious ‘liberty’ forever!

  2. Sodaburger

    Sodaburger said, about 20 hours ago

    The point of RFRA is not to discriminate against gay Americans. It is supposed to prevent the government from discriminating against religious Americans.

  3. ARodney

    ARodney said, about 20 hours ago

    The Republicans will say “we don’t mention gay discrimination anywhere in the bill!” But without the ability for businesses to discriminate against gays, this bill has no purpose, as the Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce pointed out in their strongly-worded objection. There’s a reason that Mike Pence was completely unable to “clarify” the effect of the bill: he has to be on the record as anti-gay if he wants to be a Republican, but can’t afford to be on the record as anti-gay if he wants to win a general election. If he shows leadership in either direction on this issue, his career in the modern GOP is over.

  4. kattbailey

    kattbailey said, about 20 hours ago

    When the only bakery in town has to make a cake for the mixed race couple when they disapprove (and misquote the Bible to do it), has to make it so I can get in with my wheelchair so I can do a tasting for a wedding cake when they believe it’s not worth it for a few people, but can turn away one group of people who aren’t trying to do a single thing that wouldn’t be celebrated by the store when a bride and groom come in for their tasting, when two people doing the exact same things a straight couple does is “pushing their lifestyle” and “what they do should stay in the bedroom” when straight couples can be seen together in public… that is a law based on discrimination.

  5. logicalone

    logicalone said, about 19 hours ago

    Watched Inglorious Besterds last night and saw a Jew forced to host a Nazi party. If a Jew survived a concentration camp, would they have to serve a Nazi swatsticker shaped cake at a Nazi wedding?


    I’m not comparing gays to Nazi’s or anything, this is just a question about the right to throw people out of your business.


    Not as black and white as it seems. Do Dolce & Gabana HAVE to make little tuxedo’s for flower boy’s at a gay wedding? What a strange place we are in history today.

  6. Kip W

    Kip W said, about 19 hours ago

    “YOU’RE [slap] OPPRESSING [slap] ME! STOP [slap[] OPPRESSING [slap] ME!”
    “Well, stop slapping me.”
    “YOU’RE OPPRESSING ME AGAIN! MY RELIGION SAYS I CAN SLAP YOU!"

  7. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 19 hours ago

    Just codifying the radical right view blatantly instead of subtly. The opposite number radicals also make this national problem “not a problem” by legalizing hate. Interesting though it is Republicans most in favor of burning the Constitution by sponsoring this stuff.

  8. Zipi

    Zipi said, about 19 hours ago

    Isn’t it funny (ironic) that when the left doesn’t want to do something it’s their right, when a conservative doesn’t want to do something that the left DEMANDS (like unconditionally accepting the gay lifestyle) than it’s intolerance?

  9. WiseOrator

    WiseOrator said, about 18 hours ago

    @logicalone

    “I’m not comparing gays to Nazi’s or anything, "
    No that is exactly what you’re doing.

  10. logicalone

    logicalone said, about 18 hours ago

    @WiseOrator

    Go into a corner and sit on your thumb. You are a hateful little troll. This is a perfect example of Nazi-like behavior trying to shut down open conversation. You disgust me as an American. Close your mouth, open your mind.

  11. WiseOrator

    WiseOrator said, about 18 hours ago

    @Zipi

    Nobody is forcing you to unconditionally accept the gay “lifestyle” anymore than anyone is forcing you to unconditionally accept the so-called straight “lifestyle..”
    What supporters want is equal and HUMAN rights as specifically set forth in the Constitution. You know that d@m piece of paper that only matters when the CONservatives can twist it and amend it to suit their wants and whims.

  12. nighthawks

    nighthawks GoComics PRO Member said, about 18 hours ago

    @ARodney you nailed it there.

    I live in Indy and I am ashamed of the seedy
    politicians that run this state

  13. WiseOrator

    WiseOrator said, about 18 hours ago

    Isn’t it funny (ironic really) (sorry zipi, didn’t mean to rip off your opening) that those so obstinately against equal rights for all and who use the bible to justify their bigotry so readily ignore other parts of the bible.
    I mean yes the bible does say do not lay with a man like a man lays with a woman. But the bible also says, Matthew 7:1“Judge not, that you be not judged. 2For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you.
    And no, being heterosexual will NOT save you from the judgment of yourself that you deem yourself worthy to mete out upon others you deem unworthy or gross, or icky or immoral.

  14. dzw3030

    dzw3030 said, about 18 hours ago

    i can’t help but notice nobody has posted a quote from the bill to make their point.

  15. ODon

    ODon said, about 18 hours ago

    @Sodaburger

    “The point of RFRA is not to discriminate against gay Americans. It is is suppose to prevent the government from discriminating against religious Americans.”
    No RFRA is about the right for anyone to discriminate for any “religious” reason.

  16. Load 15 more comments. | Load the rest (40).