Clay Bennett by Clay Bennett

Clay Bennett

Comments (13) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. AgentSmith101

    AgentSmith101 said, over 2 years ago

    After his statement the entire diner was wiped out by a tornado from a storm the likes of which haven’t been seen in 100 years.
    Nope. No Climate Change here.

  2. sclark55

    sclark55 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    I found a PDF the other day, a memo from Pat Moynihan to the White House in 1969, saying “It is now pretty clearly agreed that the C02 content will rise 25% by 2000.” Anybody have the latest on this?

  3. ODon

    ODon said, over 2 years ago

    davis I’ll repeat basically what I said to you earlier. Climate change is not caused by man you are correct. The tremendous acceleration of climate change is caused by man. Believe what you will but listening to scientists over blowhards seems a reasonable path to me.

  4. HabaneroBuck

    HabaneroBuck said, over 2 years ago

    There were record colds all over the place this year. Every morning in February was in the negatives (F) in my region this year. I guess the thermometer counts only when it is advantageous to the cause? Couple of years ago, we were told to ignore our senses, because it was much larger than observing the thermometer on a seasonal basis.

  5. ODon

    ODon said, over 2 years ago

    @HabaneroBuck

    Your statement is incredibly short sighted.

  6. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    At least that’s what those with a vested interest want you to believe.

  7. lonecat

    lonecat said, over 2 years ago

    @HabaneroBuck

    I guess the thermometer only counts when it’s in your region?

  8. PianoGuy24

    PianoGuy24 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @AgentSmith101

    So you admit there was dangerous weather 100 years ago…what caused it back then? There wasn’t hardly any CO2 as there is today. How about that the Earth has natural patterns???

  9. chipscount

    chipscount said, over 2 years ago

    at one point flat earth was ‘settled science’

  10. lonecat

    lonecat said, over 2 years ago

    @chipscount

    You say that “at one point flat earth was ‘settled science’”. I’m not sure that’s true. It may have been settled non-science, but scientists have known every since the times of the ancient Greeks that the earth was roughly spherical, and they even had a pretty good measure of it. But let’s say that you were right, let’s say that scientists at one time believed that the earth was flat. Now we know, if the word “know” has any meaning at all, that the earth is not flat. Can you seriously imagine that scientists will change their minds and decide that the earth is flat? I can imagine a weirdo-religious movement that might make such a claim, but I can’t seriously imagine that science will ever go back on the claim that the earth is not flat but roughly spherical. So I would say that there is such a thing as settled science. There is also a lot of less settled science. The science of global climate change is not entirely settled. The reports I read give levels of confidence — and these days the best scientists are saying that there is a very high level of confidence that the climate is changing and that human activity is a significant contributing factor. So it’s not entirely settled, but it’s close.

  11. Radish

    Radish GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    He will believe the thermometer when it hits 120.

  12. AgentSmith101

    AgentSmith101 said, over 2 years ago

    @PianoGuy
    Possibly, but it’s going to start happening more frequently than every 100 years. More like every couple summers or every summer. Too much and too fast.

  13. AgentSmith101

    AgentSmith101 said, over 2 years ago

    @mdavis4183
    Then why do antarctic ice core samples contain larger and larger concentration of C02 around the time the industrial revolution started. You can’t be isolated from the system when you are living in it.

  14. Refresh Comments.