Clay Bennett by Clay Bennett

Clay Bennett

Comments (12) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ahab

    ahab GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Hey NRA how many more will you kill before Christmas Day? http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=gun-science-proves-arming-untrained-citizens-bad-idea

  2. Reynard61

    Reynard61 said, over 2 years ago

    Do they even bother to ask anymore?

  3. Kaffekup

    Kaffekup said, over 2 years ago

    I think that secretly, they can’t wait to use them. Awful to buy something and never be able to use it. On the range? Too much like training.

  4. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    I do wish Clay would separate “gun owner”, like me, folks who believe in the Second Amendment, AND regulation as called for by SCOTUS in “D.C. vs Heller”, and responsible gun ownership, from the NRA and their constant support for access to weapons civlians DO NOT NEED! It’s been a long time since NRA stood for support of hunters with rifles and shotguns intended for hunting, and switched their focus ot “protect” short weapons with high capacity magazines, AND the ever popular armor piercing bullets. (intended for hunting PEOPLE!)

  5. Jim Guess

    Jim Guess said, over 2 years ago

    I will. Bennett is a moron.

  6. Jim Guess

    Jim Guess said, over 2 years ago

    @dtroutma

    By the way, dtroutma, the original purpose of the 2nd Amendment was to allow the people to protect themselves from a tyrannical government. It was not intended to give the citizens ‘sporting’ weapons.

  7. ARodney

    ARodney said, over 2 years ago

    Right. Clay is a moron because no gun owner ever pulled a gun on someone who just knocked on the door. Do you conservatives even read the news? Or does your news exclude gun violence?

  8. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Thanks martens, a fact the NRA constantly denies.

  9. wmconelly

    wmconelly said, over 2 years ago

    Shotgun to the face, wasn’t it?

  10. Radish

    Radish GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Stand your ground against knock knock jokes.

  11. Reynard61

    Reynard61 said, over 2 years ago

    dtroutma said: “I do wish Clay would separate ‘gun owner’, like me, folks who believe in the Second Amendment, AND regulation as called for by SCOTUS in ‘D.C. vs Heller’, and responsible gun ownership, from the NRA and their constant support for access to weapons civlians DO NOT NEED!”


    Nope; sorry, dtroutma. It’s not Clay’s job to separate ‘gun owner(s)’ like you from the NRA. It’s the job of gun owners like you to separate YOURSELVES from the NRA. If you don’t like how the NRA is representing gun owners like you, DON’t JOIN! If gun owners like you don’t like how they’re being represented by the NRA, then RESIGN YOUR MEMBERSHIPS! (I give the Elder George Bush a lot of credit for having the cojones to do this after the NRA’s “Jackbooted thugs” statement.) If gun owners like you don’t like how the NRA is representing you before Congress, then STOP GIVING THEM MONEY EVERY TIME THEY SEND OUT THEIR OVER-THE-TOP PROPAGANDA! If gun owners like you don’t like the NRA’s stewardship of the “tradition” of firearms in America, THEN TAKE IT BACK!!!


    You have only yourselves to blame for the current state of affairs in regards to being seen as paranoid, shoot-first-and-have-no-regrets villains because you let the worst examples of your group take over and become your face and voice — and now it’s the ONLY face and voice that anyone sees or hears in regards to gun ownership. So pardon me if I have no sympathy for your complaint — or you.

  12. Reynard61

    Reynard61 said, over 2 years ago

    @ martens: Even if point #2 is irrelevant in dtroutma’s particular case, the rest of my post still stands: As long as gun owners let the NRA be the face and voice of gun owners — whether the gun owners want the NRA to be that face and voice or not — then the American public (and, indeed, the rest of the world) will continue to associate the NRA with gun ownership. (And all that that association implies.)

  13. Refresh Comments.