Well Doc, you speak from ideology spewing the current talking points all the time. If you look at the current state of affairs, you can see where a the “new and improved” moral code holds sway.Let’s start with religion – which again I have no use for. What has your new moral code produced there? Tolerance of different views and opinions? Or perhaps not. Now remember that just a scant 50 years ago, this country (as it still is) was nominally Christian as claimed by the citizens on collected data. Were these “christians” all tolerant of other beliefs? NO. But did they call for persecution in the courts for those that did not embrace a religious creed? again no. The stand was that this was a country where you are free to believe what you will. How about today? So gays – while not being my personal cup of tea – are “tolerated” and should not be discriminated against in any way. Even though they as a group are a very small section of the whole.How about “race relations”? Not good in the past but the “primitive” moral code recognized and slowly began the journey to rectify the situation. No thanks to the democrats. Just sayin….And “family values”? Well, since the family unit is the basis for society, it would seem prudent to support family values. You know, a bread winner, a care giver and teacher forming and maintaining a support foundation for any children. Gays can do it. So can single parents. However, look at the results of no Dads in the family (dads are a place holder in the formula and can take either function). The situation in the “welfare” areas where the government is the breadwinner and the caregiver is intent on their comfort and their “necessities” rather than the welfare of the child is self evident. Our “primitive” morals are better suited to giving the children a strong foundation with defined rules, limits and responsibilities. Does it always work? No. But it works better than what you see in Chicago and Detroit and ….uhhh…. toronto….LOLSo reject “morality”? No, you are right. No one has said that morals are not of value.However, as always, actions speak louder than words.What kind of moral code do you think Mr. Ford has or even our PRESIDENT?