Chan Lowe by Chan Lowe

Chan Lowe


Comments (27) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. mickey1339

    mickey1339 GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    Looks like it’s all over except the blame game and the deepening partisan divide. It’s a shame the background check failed. That really would have been a useful tool.

  2. edinbaltimore

    edinbaltimore GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    At least the “take your concealed carry to every state regardless” amendment to the bill also failed. What happened to the “states rights” argument the GOP usually uses?

  3. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, 12 months ago


    You’re right. We need MUCH stricter gun laws than the one that failed in Congress.
    Obama was right. It was cowardice on the part of senators, including Democratic senators, who failed to recognize the will of 90% of Americans who WANT STRICTER GUN CONTROLS.
    And even 70% of the NRA is willing to have better background checks and the like.
    Wayne LaPierre and the NRA machine are not supporting the will of their own organization’s members — just that of the arms manufacturers.

  4. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, 12 months ago


    Yes. 90% of Americans want background checks.

  5. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago


    You must understand, Democrats in the Senate voted No on this Bill

  6. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago


    Strict Gun Laws did not prevent the murder of a young lady in Chicago just one mile from Obama’s Home.

  7. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago


    Yes, you can also massage the numbers to show 90$ of Americans oppose Background checks by the way you ask the question.

  8. Clark  Kent

    Clark Kent said, 12 months ago

    My house (shipping crate under a bridge) is a gun free zone!

  9. mikefive

    mikefive said, 12 months ago

    It’s a sad commentary on our Senate that they can’t write a simple bill with only backround checks in it. This is what has overwhelming support. From the Senate bill, S.649 second reading, cover page-“….and require a background check for every firearm sale, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES” (upper case is mine).

    The killer for this bill was the “other purposes” allowed into this bill. Everybody stuck their fingers in it, including the backround check part, and added amendments that multiple parties found objectionable, making it impossible to reach the required consensus.

    What I most object to about this situation is that the politicians are performing lies of omission by acting like this bill is only about backround checks. The media is going along with it either because of their own agenda or because they are too lazy to read the bill and understand why some would object to some portions of same.

    The entire bill, second reading can be found at:
    Click on “Continue to GPO site”
    I have verified that this site address does work.
    Another source that is easier to read is:

  10. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, 12 months ago


    Thank goodness he wasn’t reelected through the will of the people!

  11. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, 12 months ago


    Me for one, Harley…As far as I am concerned, thats all that matters !

    But, I cannot tell you about the 90%..even if I am a member…But, I do believe it..The American people are NOT happy with currents events.
    Read the polls…google….
    can you do that ??

    I’ll deduce that you think is fine for the mass-murdering to continue without a finger being raised….
    Hatred….for oneself and others…

  12. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, 12 months ago


    Boy !
    Talk about dense..
    Not sorry for being emotional, either..
    The bill is designed to save lives – everywhere, NOT just SandyHook..
    This bill, is, unfortunately, a POS, thanks to Lilly-livered congressmen.

  13. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, 12 months ago


    Democrats and Republicans, both, can be lily-livered..
    We must have reform !

  14. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, 12 months ago


    No bill will be 100% !
    Or, then, you seem to wish to do nothing , due to the above ??

  15. mickey1339

    mickey1339 GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    @Mr. King

    You could call them DINO’s. What’s your point?

    No, you could just call them politicians. Almost all the republicans voted against it. Politics reigned supreme. Yet silently they passed legislation to gut the insider trading, financial disclosure requirements for congress. There is no honor amongst them, they have proven themselves to be a totally selfish, self centered lot that care only for themselves and hold themselves above the laws they enforce on us.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (12).