Comments (8) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   prrdh said, 6 months ago

   Since the nickel was also in a state of flux during that time, it wasn’t necessary for anyone to steal it. His not observing it in the morning was enough to make it disappear.

   Although I’m not sure if that would only be true if the Copenhagen interpretation is true. It makes my head hurt trying to figure out how that would play out under the Everett interpretation.
2. 

   pschearer said, 6 months ago

   I recently read an interesting statement: Mathematics is an approximation of reality, not the other way around.
   

   
   It doesn’t make any difference what the equations may say—that cat is either alive or dead regardless of whether anyone is looking.
3. 

   761st said, 6 months ago

   Still, theories like this don’t quite work in the dimension we inhabit in time. Kinda like an ostrich being invisible because his head is inthe sand.
4. 

   paytonb said, 6 months ago

   @pschearer

   Such a simple an accurate statement pschearer. It’s just a shame so many in the scientific community seem to believe the exact opposite.
5. 

   acesover said, 6 months ago

   We may be on the way to finding out that we are just a computer simulation and thus taking all this way to seriously:

   
   

   The Measurement That Would Reveal The Universe As A Computer Simulation
   
6. 

   Gee Man said, 6 months ago

   The answer is 42.
7. 

   surfstuff55 said, 6 months ago

   @Gee Man

   Don’t panic and make sure your towel is handy!
8. 

   Bailey said, 6 months ago

   @acesover

   Thank you! I love your link.
9. Refresh Comments.