Is being cut off from an organization of co-operating countries all that Boris advertises it will be? Is there some defective thinking here?…hhmmm? What could it be? Will Britain’s people really be better taken care of? I’m missing the point…what makes it better? What makes it “being in control” a matter of standing alone? Here in the U.S., we have seen the fallacy of a leader’s me-first policy making decisions, of withdrawing our country from participation in worldwide policy making for us all. Is nationalism over globalism a really good survival method?. IDK…maybe we are seeing the results of political isolationism over global political co-operation? Have we really been better served by isolationist authoritarian leaders?
Is being cut off from an organization of co-operating countries all that Boris advertises it will be? Is there some defective thinking here?…hhmmm? What could it be? Will Britain’s people really be better taken care of? I’m missing the point…what makes it better? What makes it “being in control” a matter of standing alone? Here in the U.S., we have seen the fallacy of a leader’s me-first policy making decisions, of withdrawing our country from participation in worldwide policy making for us all. Is nationalism over globalism a really good survival method?. IDK…maybe we are seeing the results of political isolationism over global political co-operation? Have we really been better served by isolationist authoritarian leaders?