We still don’t have the actual Mueller report, just William Barr’s summary (or not a summary) four-page letter. But even Barr’s letter acknowledges that, whether or not Trump himself was knowingly involved, the Russians interfered in the 2020 presidential campaign to influence it in favor of Trump’s election, which would help their twin goals of:
a) stopping Hillary, who had spoken out against Russian tyranny and the illegitimacy of their “elections”
and
b) installing their own chaos candidate to destabilize and undermine the government of their strongest adversary, and one on whom they had compromising evidence of wrongdoing
So even Barr acknowledges that Trump is being used as a Russian asset.
The only question now, whether or not there is evidence that rises to “beyond a reasonable doubt,” is whether Trump is a useful idiot knowingly or unknowingly.
We still don’t have the actual Mueller report, just William Barr’s summary (or not a summary) four-page letter. But even Barr’s letter acknowledges that, whether or not Trump himself was knowingly involved, the Russians interfered in the 2020 presidential campaign to influence it in favor of Trump’s election, which would help their twin goals of:
a) stopping Hillary, who had spoken out against Russian tyranny and the illegitimacy of their “elections”
and
b) installing their own chaos candidate to destabilize and undermine the government of their strongest adversary, and one on whom they had compromising evidence of wrongdoing
So even Barr acknowledges that Trump is being used as a Russian asset.
The only question now, whether or not there is evidence that rises to “beyond a reasonable doubt,” is whether Trump is a useful idiot knowingly or unknowingly.
Wittingly or half-wittingly.
But exoneration? Not so much.