Ted Rall for November 21, 2005
Transcript:
Science marches on. (Scientist: Some solar systems have nine planets. Others don't. Some planets are asteroids. Efficient creatures like dinosaurs die after small changes in the weather. Meanwhile, peacoks and mayflies are still with us. Darwin's theory of evolution doesn't explain a world where humans only access 25% of their brains. Only a stupid designer could be responsible.) Stupid design posts that the chaotic and disoreinted nature of the universe points to an idiotic. Inept and/or lazy supernatural creator. (Woman: 2 million years of evolution led to me- a lesbian who won't breed. Nice going, God!) Evolutionary biologists reject stupid design as science. (Man: A malevolent or fema-like creator is an intruiguing idea- one that should be explored in philosophy or political science class.) The debate boils down to one's biew of the universe is it "complex" or just messy? (Man 2: God a la michelangelo? Or just a bumb? Whatever)