Compass

su43dipta Free

Recent Comments

  1. about 16 hours ago on Peanuts

    If this ^^ comment doesn’t get 100 likes by the end of the day, I’ll lose faith in humanity.

  2. about 16 hours ago on Cul de Sac

    I’m glad that everyone ended their vacation on a happy note.

  3. about 16 hours ago on Cul de Sac

    Exactly, and since it’s just a still photo, you don’t care about how long it lasted, 15 min or the whole weekend.

  4. about 16 hours ago on Cul de Sac
    “And where in the strip you can see, or anyone has mentioned, an event horizon…?” I just gave an example of the alternate instance of something hard to see but not transparent. I don’t need anyone to mention it in the strip to give an example, especially in the other case where something is hard to see. Also, a “black body” can be anything with 100% light absorption; it doesn’t have to be a black hole. I mentioned a black hole because it is the most prominent example of a black body.
  5. about 16 hours ago on Cul de Sac

    I say again, “Trasparent” implies “Hard to see”; “Hard to see” doesn’t always imply “Transparent”.

  6. about 16 hours ago on Cul de Sac

    YOU mentioned referring to Roget’s twice in your comments; I just wrote those off the top of my head AND I do know what pedantic means. If you don’t like my explanation or don’t understand it, then that’s just unfortunate.

  7. 1 day ago on Calvin and Hobbes

    Tigers have other senses, too, you know.

  8. 1 day ago on Peanuts

    Plus whatever the TV has to teach.

  9. 1 day ago on Cul de Sac

    yeah, true! So he is becoming transparent.

  10. 1 day ago on Cul de Sac

    Anything transparent is hard to see, but anything hard to see may not be transparent, like a black hole. If light can travel through an object, it is transparent; if light gets absorbed by the object, it is hard to see but not transparent, it’s just a black body.