Retired Railroad Engineer
@JASON ALLEN; Just a point of clarification; The “ol’ sleazepot Clinton” was NOT “set to join with Republicans on privatizing Social Security.” There was a significant disagreement on the methods proposed by each: “In essence, the two parties split this way: Republicans proposed to “carve out” personal accounts within the existing Social Security system, while Democrats proposed to “add on” personal accounts while leaving the current defined-benefit system of Social Security in place.” Clinton’s plan maintained the current SS funding amount and mechanism, so would only be “privatization” in a peripheral way and would not reduce the “Fund” revenue, hence not effecting benefit levels for non-participants. The Republican plan would invest money extracted from “Fund” revenue, reducing benefits for all or hastening the end of Social Security’s sustainability…at least that’s the way it looks to me. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/02/22/clintons-claim-that-bush-wanted-to-give-the-social-security-trust-fund-to-wall-street/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.1bbf11d78395
Projection……again, DAG !
But @DANI RICE; “Justice delayed is Justice denied !” – I’m retired, age 72, just getting over being screwed by Bush – and, now this ? Some of us are a little ‘SHORT’ – on a lotta things.
? Last panel; Desks are ‘flipped around’, mirror-image position of the previous panels…?
ANOTHER EXCELLENT Sunday strip, Mr. Boreman !
Because, whichever they answer, they might be held to it.
So you were expecting the Republican-controlled (but for 4 months) Congress to investigate, perhaps indict members of the Bush/Cheney Executive branch ? Be ‘nice’ – blame Obama, the “One Term President.”
Hey, ANDY – Mr.O LET THEM IN, despite their (legal) self-identification as “Entertainment” – NOT a real NEWS network. Will Trump accredit and seat “COMEDY CENTRAL” ?
^@AVATR: Typical Winger projection.
Excellent art, as usual, Mr.Bennett !