And the robo-calls. Of course, I personally think the Citizens United ruling was a good thing. ANY limit on political speech is (or should be) a violation of the first amendment. It’s at least a violation of what the founders intended.
Not ready to lead? This Administration refused to increase security in a Muslim country on the anniversary of 9/11 and then after the event, the first thing our Beloved Leader did was fly to Vegas for a fundraiser. The same Beloved Leader who visited the View, but not world leaders at the UN?\
I have to love it. Mitt says that he intends to cut funding to a business that the government has no constitutional role in funding, a business that is quite solvent without government funding anyway, and not only do you say he’s wanting to kill that business, you are also saying he’s wanting to for homophobic reasons. Start using your head to think with and not just as a hat rack, and reason your way through what you’re saying.
Sorry, but you have the wrong candidate who “doesn’t even believe in America.” What was all this “fundamentally transform America,” and “ready to {rule} by day one” crap? (emphasis on rule is my own) Mitt wants America to be more like the founders envisioned and less than what it is today. He also understands that our president LEADS not RULES.
Reading all these comments about how much better a debater BHO will be and I just have to laugh. I KNEW MR would out-perform BHO, after all, teleprompers were not allowed in the debate and besides, BHO has no experience talking to anyone who doesn’t believe his pack of lies and has the ability and knowledge to refute it. If you surround yourself with “Yes Men” all the time, you will get burned in the real world.
of course…. the last 4 years: “It’s all Bush’s fault.”