Incidentally, while I can see why someone might decide to remove Garfield’s name here, I think leaving it in would just make Jon look crazier and improve the strip.
“Not surprisingly given the higher degree of supervision, loans made under the CRA program were made in a more responsible way than other subprime loans. CRA loans carried lower rates than other subprime loans and were less likely to end up securitized into the mortgage-backed securities that have caused so many losses, according to a recent study by the law firm Traiger & Hinckley (PDF file here).”
Jack, that doesn’t even seem coherent. “We’re not rude,” you say, “because [unrelated lie].”
Oh and here’s what we mean. Admittedly, this comes from a media personality, but Cheney and others in the administration tried to give the same impression: “The people who now doubt whether or not Saddam really has WMD programs, chemical and bacteriological, in particular, are really of two types, either they work for Saddam or they’re doing a human imitation of an ostrich. There really are, I think, no other possibilities.”
Does anyone know why conservatives here keep crying, “WAA”?
As usual, this would make more sense and look much better if they just did what it said on the label. Just take Garfield out. I don’t understand why they have such trouble grasping this. (You want someone to draw a black line and complete the balloon? I can do that.) And I think some of the people hating on the concept would like it better if the, let’s say artist, stuck to it.
Alien robot pirate ninjas? Well, I don’t know where the True Secret of Monkey Island came from if it wasn’t alien in origin.