Recent Comments

1. about 6 hours ago on B.C.

   Actually, there’s quite a bit of evidence that they did. But of course that doesn’t fit the popular “scientific” narrative (actually based on philosophical assumptions rather than science). So of course we’re all supposed to ignore it, try to explain it away, or whatever.

   Never forget that a lot of what you’re told is “known,” particularly about the distant past, is actually “assumed.”

2. 2 days ago on Ziggy

   I’d like to see someone being paid to hold two signs that contradict each other.

3. 9 days ago on B.C.

   I’m not forgetting anything about the fossil record. As for “gaps keep getting filled in,” that’s as far from reality as it gets. “Gaps” is a huge understatement anyway, and there’s nothing showing up in them (much less filling them) but guesswork — which was my original point. Excuses, name-calling, etc., doesn’t change that.

4. 10 days ago on B.C.

   “In-betweens” are science fiction; contrary to popular belief, not a single one of the very few that supposedly exist is any better than highly disputable.

   The idea of “evolution” makes for a good cartoon joke, but not much else.

5. 20 days ago on Peanuts

   As of this writing, the strips from this week are mixed up here.

   11/30 is missing (dog dish returned)

   12/1 is missing (sun has fallen) (Sunday strip)

   12/2 incorrectly shown as 11/30 (surprised with card)

   12/3 incorrectly shown as 12/1 (sack full of trees)

   12/4 incorrectly shown as 12/2 (a lot of arithmetic)

   12/5 incorrectly shown as 12/3 (slice of bread)

   12/6 incorrectly shown as 12/4 (ground to a halt) as well as on correct date

   12/7 incorrectly shown as 12/5 (bread crumbs) as well as on correct date

   See: peanuts.wikia.com/wiki/November_1968_comic_strips & peanuts.wikia.com/wiki/December_1968_comic_strips

6. about 1 month ago on Calvin and Hobbes

   “What historical “evidence” of dinosaurs in recorded history?” – You don’t have to put quotes around “evidence.” Evidence doesn’t stop being evidence just because it points in a different direction than popular thinking says it should.

   “There are also mosaics and paintings of gorgons, fauns, satyrs, unicorns – are you saying that such depictions are ‘historical evidence’ of such creatures actually existing?” – A depiction of an imaginary creature means someone imagined it. A depiction of a real creature means someone saw it. Now, which category does a dinosaur fit into? You tell me.

7. about 2 months ago on Garfield

   Only in a layman’s use of the term “theory.” In proper terms, it’s only a hypothesis.

8. about 2 months ago on Calvin and Hobbes

   I’m surprised that no one else has commented on this part: Calvin is only concerned about finding Hobbes, not his parents.

9. about 2 months ago on Pearls Before Swine

   How about more manure?

10. 2 months ago on The Born Loser

    The biggest compliment Thornapple ever got from his boss…