Lisa Benson for March 05, 2024

  1. Download  6
    Joe1962 Premium Member 3 months ago

    It was a slam dunk in favor of Trump.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    brwydave Premium Member 3 months ago

    Is it a question of state’s rights or complete election anarchy?

     •  Reply
  3. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member 3 months ago

    The extreme right wing six ‘justices’ are in the bag for Trump and are doing all they can to prevent Trump from ever going to trial on any federal charges, especially the obvious theft of top secret/sensitive classified documents.

    Some of those documents are STILL missing.

     •  Reply
  4. Fbab547a f046 46c4 98b5 08cf0dc801d6
    Kracklin Rosie - “Tolo Dan Nan Galad” Premium Member 3 months ago
    The Supreme Court ruled UNANIMOUSLY that Colorado, and thus any other state, does not have the power to remove President Trump from its ballot under the 14th Amendment. I said in these forums when this nonsense first started that only the Congress, not the states, have the authority under the 14th Amendment to do this. Now, those Colorado judges should be impeached for abuse of power and exceeding their authority, same for any other state official who tried this stunt. A judge or any state official should be competent enough to properly interpret the Constitution and its Bill of Rights.

    Again, even the left wing Democrat Judges came down on the side of the Constitution in this ruling. All you lefties are swinging in the wind.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Hello Everyone  3 months ago

    It should be a picture of a Tank Rolling over State’s rights.

     •  Reply
  6. P1000380
    A# 466  3 months ago

    The character smashed under the gavel represents either the American people or the electoral system. Or both. The SCOTUS ruling also made it harder, or impossible, to remove from national ballots — if they are so declared prior to an election — those candidates who fall under the categories mentioned in the 14th amendment, or to remove them from office after they are elected.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    aristoclesplato9  3 months ago

    Now Dems are saying the liberal justices are as bad as conservative. The entire court needs to be abolished.

    At least the 9-0 ruling is bringing the true agenda of the left to the surface. They want to tear down the government starting with SCOTUS.

     •  Reply
  8. D2368647 e8f6 4012 b9e8 ca2bb82f553b
    DC Swamp  3 months ago

    Yup, the leftists took a pounding.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    tpcox928  3 months ago

    SCOTUS wiped out the Voting Rights Act because it was working (insert own “duh?” sound here) and Red states went full on voter suppression (SCOTUS cannot tell states how to handle elections), then tells states they have no right to determine who is on the ballot (SCOTUS can tell states how to handle elections). See the consistency? Me, neither.

     •  Reply
  10. Braveheart
    Free or Not? Premium Member 3 months ago

    Don’t worry the leftist whackos and blue state Attorney Generals will NOT stop. The 3 leftists on the court left the door open saying they didn’t agree this ruling stopped “other” federal action to keep Trump off the ballot. Once he is unjustly convicted in a D.C. Court after the nomination is secured, there will be states that try to remove Trump from the ballot because he would be a “felon”. A wacko is gonna wacko!

     •  Reply
  11. Mongo
    Mongo  3 months ago

    Sorry to disappoint you Dims, but the rule of law prevails. Again.


    Think about that, even the ‘liberal’ judges agreed Colorado went to far, and effectively, stopped all this nonsense pending from the other states.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    think it through  3 months ago

    I thought republicans were all about ‘’states rights’’ until their not.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    davidthoms1  3 months ago

    Under the Courts new ruling, States can’t enforce compliance with the United States Constitution!

     •  Reply
  14. Img 1050a2
    Grandma Lea  3 months ago

    What most overlook and if you go back to the original case, as I mentioned then, that the 14th amendment only applies to the general election and not to the primaries. Primaries are the selection within the party as to who will represent them in the general election it is not an official ballot per say. It is a word game that needs to be played correctly to get the correct outcome. Apply the law where the law was designed to be applied, not where you want it to apply.

     •  Reply
  15. Picture
    Ontman  3 months ago

    Right, Lisa. More rights smashed.

     •  Reply
  16. Rabbit hat
    s49nav  3 months ago

    A. F. Branco used the term “Bench slapped”. Which is why we need to see his cartoons appearing here, along with those of Tom Stiglich.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    billwog  3 months ago

    What an example of the complete division the DNC has instilled in the former United States of America. And the sheeple bleat right along.

     •  Reply
  18. 8c8a2b88 b943 4341 8658 bea1e9116261 1 201 a
    cbedda  3 months ago

    considering the knowledge that half the court is corrupt and bought, and that they do not have any enforcement power except their acceptance as being untainted (18% approval rating) maybe colorado should ignore them as the court has ignored the law and the will of the people (oh and the constitution) We keep playing by the rules while the bannons and the rumps walk all over every loop hole and bribe they can get, not to mention our friends the russians and no korea. The argument that a state would have too much power to decide an election was opposite of what happen with Bush v Gore in Florida. And the same with reproduction rights, can we say 1920’s. This is Moscow Mitch’s tactics. Cant have a justice put on the bench, too close to an election, and then wam, weeks before a changing of the guard. Impeach twice but since out of office, what’s the point. Moscow Mitch will be in the history books as the biggest enemy of the United States and Democracy since rump and his team of a-s-s holes.

     •  Reply
  19. 8c8a2b88 b943 4341 8658 bea1e9116261 1 201 a
    cbedda  3 months ago

    side note. Kentucky benefited more from the money that California paid into the emergency funds than any other state in the union. Why should that be allowed when they make it a point to s-h-i-t on California every chance they get? Let them pay their own bills since we are such an awful group of left wing radicals.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    dpatrickryan Premium Member 3 months ago

    Funny how the right wing loonies aren’t complaining about federal overreach now…

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    preacherman  3 months ago

    As I understand the high courts decision, they overturned the state high courts decisions since they decided that the US Constitution Amendment was for the federal courts to decide, not the state courts. So, even if SCOTUS thought that Trump was in violation of said amendment, their decision was based on a jurisdictional dispute.

     •  Reply
  22. Edb4beaa 19ab 437d a460 cf4fba2a5e74
    syzygy47  3 months ago

    Much as I’d like to see Don the Con removed from a State’s ballots, I can see how it’s possible it could set a precedent where states like Texas or Florida, unimpaired by loyalty to the Constitution, the country or ‘critical thinking’, would do the same especially if they saw a possibility of losing control.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    salmon43  3 months ago

    The decision by SCOTUS actually made no difference on the Colorado primary’s Republican ballot because Trump’s name remained on it for today’s election. I’m unsure what would have happened to those votes if the SCOTUS decision had gone the other way.

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    dlw54650 Premium Member 3 months ago

    Judges, both conservative leaning and liberal leaning, see the problem with the ruling by the five male justices. They basically neutralized the 14th amendment’s third clause by misinterpreting the constitution.

    Even Amy Coney Barrett couldn’t bring herself to join those male justices because she knew they were not making a correct judgement.

     •  Reply
  25. Img 1050a2
    Grandma Lea  3 months ago

    The Fourteenth Amendment Section 3 states:“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”

    The big points here is 1) shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.

    This does not say they have to be convicted of anything, “just witnessed by citizens as engaging in” is all that is needed to disqualify anyone so engaged.

    To override the rule established by the Fourteenth Amendment in Section 3, The Amendment itself takes overriding it out of the supreme courts hands and places it squarely in Congress’ by stating the following:

    But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

     •  Reply
  26. 392945134 10222966427101539 7291125585212099960 n  1
    FJB  Premium Member 3 months ago

    The libs got a well-deserved “Bi Tch Slap Down”. How sweet it is! Like a piece of fine chocolate.

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    tpcox928  3 months ago

    SCOTUS is working to shred the Constitution it’s sworn to uphold. MAGA-GOP keeps saying it out loud: End Democracy!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Lisa Benson