Actually, what we REALLY need is for ALL opinions to have a solidly factual basis for their founding. Examples:
opinions that the $1400 distribution was WAY TOO MUCH would be allowed whereas opinions that $1400 was an attempt to buy of a voting segment would not be allowed.
Nor would such insane stupidities that Trump actually won the last election – Trump’s minions tried for six months to “prove” this hallucination and wasn’t able to come up with anything better than, "he had to have won because he said he did! " Which is not really a “reason” at all!
So let’s all just work from observable, provable “facts” okay?