It’s funny that what Dan Rather said was true. The opposition, instead of showing evidence to the contrary, that Bush fulfilled his service taher than leaving early as Rther claimed, they attacked Rather’s source, in particular the type-face, not the actual content.If they really thought Bush was innocent, they could have pulled out his service record to prove it. That never happened.
It’s funny that what Dan Rather said was true. The opposition, instead of showing evidence to the contrary, that Bush fulfilled his service taher than leaving early as Rther claimed, they attacked Rather’s source, in particular the type-face, not the actual content.If they really thought Bush was innocent, they could have pulled out his service record to prove it. That never happened.