The question is … is it more important to protect an oft-amended senate tradition of the filibuster that is not in the Constitution at the expense of the voting rights that ARE in the Constitution and the foundation of our democracy on which everything else, or is it acceptable to let voting rights die to protect an outdated tradition that was invented to protect Jim Crow and which has been repeatedly been amended?
Because you know that if the party power alignment were reversed, Mitch McMoscow would not hesitate to carve out an exception for any pet preference he had in mind, as he has already done several times.
They say democracy dies in darkness, but on this eve of the winter solstice, the darkest day of the year, democracy is being MURDERED IN BROAD DAYLIGHT.
The question is … is it more important to protect an oft-amended senate tradition of the filibuster that is not in the Constitution at the expense of the voting rights that ARE in the Constitution and the foundation of our democracy on which everything else, or is it acceptable to let voting rights die to protect an outdated tradition that was invented to protect Jim Crow and which has been repeatedly been amended?
Because you know that if the party power alignment were reversed, Mitch McMoscow would not hesitate to carve out an exception for any pet preference he had in mind, as he has already done several times.
They say democracy dies in darkness, but on this eve of the winter solstice, the darkest day of the year, democracy is being MURDERED IN BROAD DAYLIGHT.