According to the IPCC (depending on which IPCC report you read), somewhere between 15% and 80% of global warming is due to anthropological sources …. that means that somewhere between 85% and 20% of global warming is NOT due to anthropological sources. That means, if ALL anthropological sources were eliminated the planet would STILL continue to warm, albeit at a slower rate, it would STILL continue. When NASA made that very same observation in 2013 by claiming it was already too late to stop, the IPCC said we should make the effort anyway … even if it was hopeless we should expend the effort anyway …Gee if we can’t stop it anyway, would it not be a MUCH better idea to expend the effort to mitigate the impact rather than WASTE the effort (and money and jobs and time and lives) trying to stop the unstoppable?? But then that won’t make any money for the climate change religionists.
According to the IPCC (depending on which IPCC report you read), somewhere between 15% and 80% of global warming is due to anthropological sources …. that means that somewhere between 85% and 20% of global warming is NOT due to anthropological sources. That means, if ALL anthropological sources were eliminated the planet would STILL continue to warm, albeit at a slower rate, it would STILL continue. When NASA made that very same observation in 2013 by claiming it was already too late to stop, the IPCC said we should make the effort anyway … even if it was hopeless we should expend the effort anyway …Gee if we can’t stop it anyway, would it not be a MUCH better idea to expend the effort to mitigate the impact rather than WASTE the effort (and money and jobs and time and lives) trying to stop the unstoppable?? But then that won’t make any money for the climate change religionists.