So now Sidney Powell’s defense against a defamation lawsuit is that her statements were so absurd as to not be believable?
After Tucker Carlson successfully used that absurd defense against a libel charge, I guess that is their new thing. Just admit it was all made up. The cult worshippers won’t be deterred no matter how many times you humiliate them. They have basically said that no REASONABLE person could believe such absurdities, so all the gullible suckers who DO believe their conspiracy theory garbage have just had their noses rubbed in it.
While it was nonsense when Tucker, whose show is on a “news” network and who intones his pontifications with deep (if faux) sincerity, such that many (however foolishly) DO take him seriously, it is an even bigger stretch for Sidney Powell.
Powell is an attorney; she was not speaking as an entertainer; she was speaking as an attorney REPRESENTING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES when she made those statements, she was holding up all these papers (on TV shows, not in court) alleging them to be “affidavits” and was involved in 60 court cases. She expected to be taken seriously, and January 6 proves that she was, indeed, taken very seriously.
I think the ruling in the Tucker Carlson case was an aberration (I hope it is being or will be appealed), as he is the highest-rated program on a garbage outlet that has the nerve to call itself the Faux NEWS channel, but the claim is even more far-fetched coming from an ATTORNEY OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
So now Sidney Powell’s defense against a defamation lawsuit is that her statements were so absurd as to not be believable?
After Tucker Carlson successfully used that absurd defense against a libel charge, I guess that is their new thing. Just admit it was all made up. The cult worshippers won’t be deterred no matter how many times you humiliate them. They have basically said that no REASONABLE person could believe such absurdities, so all the gullible suckers who DO believe their conspiracy theory garbage have just had their noses rubbed in it.
While it was nonsense when Tucker, whose show is on a “news” network and who intones his pontifications with deep (if faux) sincerity, such that many (however foolishly) DO take him seriously, it is an even bigger stretch for Sidney Powell.
Powell is an attorney; she was not speaking as an entertainer; she was speaking as an attorney REPRESENTING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES when she made those statements, she was holding up all these papers (on TV shows, not in court) alleging them to be “affidavits” and was involved in 60 court cases. She expected to be taken seriously, and January 6 proves that she was, indeed, taken very seriously.
I think the ruling in the Tucker Carlson case was an aberration (I hope it is being or will be appealed), as he is the highest-rated program on a garbage outlet that has the nerve to call itself the Faux NEWS channel, but the claim is even more far-fetched coming from an ATTORNEY OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.