Comments (12) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   ana_demeter said, about 1 year ago

   Reason #237 why I am glad I don’t have any children!

2. 

   Wenthral said, about 1 year ago

   236

   “Are we there yet?”

3. 

   diane5919 said, about 1 year ago

   Busted!!!!

4. 

   shippingtroll said, about 1 year ago

   If it’s “Lord of the Rings”, I would rather watch the movie too. The same for ANY Dickens book. The man was payed by the word!

5. 

   Macushlalondra said, about 1 year ago

   I can’t read Dickens. I tried! He uses 14 sentences when 1 will do fine.

6. 

   chmacleod said, about 1 year ago

   We do these things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard…

   (paraphrasing Kennedy and all)

   Besides, Holly, you’ll get busted when you talk about parts where the film adaptation differs from the book.

7. 

   Doctor Toon said, about 1 year ago

   Not many movies measure of to the books they are based on. The movies would need to be MUCH longer to capture all the detail. (Thinking Stephen King here.)

8. 

   Sarah said, about 1 year ago

   someone did that once in my class for To Kill a Mockingbird! It was so funny as the movie left out a number of bits asked in the exam!

9. 

   Margueritem said, about 1 year ago

   doctortoon says:

   Not many movies measure of to the books they are based on. The movies would need to be MUCH longer to capture all the detail. (Thinking Stephen King here.)

   My one exception to the ‘book is better than the movie’ rule is Stephan King’s ‘Misery’. The movie won the battle hands down. I credit Cathy Bates for that.

10. 

    McPat said, about 1 year ago

    Reading is now overated.

11. 

    McPat said, about 1 year ago

    reading is overated.

12. 

    snarkm said, about 1 year ago

    I want this comic in animation form from now on, because reading is clearly overrated and all that ;-)