Comments (11) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   Ken Warren said, 3 days ago

   Unimportant but funny.

2. 

   scottfreitas said, 3 days ago

   Well at least people who watch cable news finally got to see Osama speak without a TelePrompTer. As opposed to the maybe 12,966 total viewers shared between CNN and MSNBC…

3. 

   Ken Warren said, 3 days ago

   As I understand it Fox News, using their current policy that they used for Palin and the “huge crowds” that showed up for a Washington protest, just used some old footage from last year.

4. 

   ANandy said, 2 days ago

   Another BozOTUS flip-flop. Fox is no longer just an entertainment medium.

5. 

   believecommonsense said, 2 days ago

   Ken,

   Fox now has five known (confirmed) cases of using footage from unrelated prior events for whatever current news stories they are supposedly reporting.

   The latest one was on Sean Hannity’s show, but the first four were on their news programs, not commentators.

   I really don’t know how one network can make the same mistake five times. Seems to me someone has to go out of their way to retrieve old, unrelated footage and edit it into a completely separate event. I don’t know how that could happen by mistake.

6. 

   fennec said, 2 days ago

   I agree, BCS. It’s not a mistake.

7. 

   Bruce4671 said, 1 day ago

   BCS, can you give me some links so I can see what your talking about - willing to learn

8. 

   Thinginthebasement said, 1 day ago

   Fox has admitted that they only have a few hours of news, the rest is opinion.

9. 

   nospam4me said, 1 day ago

   And MSLSD has zero hours of news and a 24 hour mix of venom for traditional American values and idol worship of a Stalinist Mudslime thug from Chicago.

10. 

    Ken Warren said, 1 day ago

    nospam – It’s always nice to hear from one of Fox’s viewers. I find their openmindness refreshing and well-thought out.

11. 

    Bruce4671 said, about 15 hours ago

    Well gee…doesn’t Glenn have a phone just for Pres or his staff to call and correct his wrong viewpoint?

    Ken, you have to agree that Chigaco” politics is in play AND the Advisors to the president DO have a rather radical background.

    Were not the people promised certain things like transparency, the ability to read bills, coverage of debates, no lobbyists, no special interest influence? And what did we get. Certainly not any of that….