I agree that a healthy bit of skepticism is necessary, particularly where it pertains to government. However, on the topic of climate change, the amount of evidence, both from the science and from our own eyes, seems very compelling. I would assert that a version of Pascal’s Wager would be a good approach to take and assume that it is real.
In a healthy society, the goal, to an extent, is to socialize medical costs and privatize the benefits. In that manner, no one is left to suffer poverty due to an illness. In the US, this has been flipped so that the less wealthy are now left to fend for themselves….or die and decrease the excess population.
I agree that a healthy bit of skepticism is necessary, particularly where it pertains to government. However, on the topic of climate change, the amount of evidence, both from the science and from our own eyes, seems very compelling. I would assert that a version of Pascal’s Wager would be a good approach to take and assume that it is real.