Recent Comments

1. over 9 years ago on Lisa Benson

   The socialist aspect of the Nazi party was more or less a remnant of the original forming of the party. Once Hitler came into being, after being told to investigate the party by the Military, whom he was still part of, the Nazi’s slowly started to form into a more Nationalistic party, rather then a socialist one. The Nazis never dropped the “socialist” aspect from their name due to the fact they still wanted to keep the appearance of being for “the workers”, however this was solely a political maneuver, much like Hitlers flirtation with the bankers, and other business leaders of Germany during this time. One could easily say that Hitler played all sides against each other in order to gain what he really wanted – Total power over everything. This is what he achieved, and he did it by being the “perfect” politician. Calling him a “lefty” or a “righty” is an easy way for people to make their arguments seem valid. The said truth was he was neither. Hitlers political doctrine was what ever he needed to be at any given time. This only stopped after he Gained full power and control. History shows what happened next….

2. over 9 years ago on Darrin Bell

   I always forget to remember that civilian casualties have only occurred in the past 15 yrs of warfare. After all, The US military started that trend. Pay no attention to the past 2000+ years of history.

3. over 9 years ago on Lalo Alcaraz

   No need for them to fund the enlightened pseudo-leaders in America. The truth is we will destroy our selves long before any outside threat can harm us in a meaningful way. Always remember, Rome wasn’t built in a day, but nor was it destroyed in one either.

4. over 9 years ago on Dan Wasserman

   Funny to think the FDA was more or less created to stop snake oil salesman. Another fine example of a Government program living up to its expectations. Don’t worry, I am sure they will get it right… eventually….

5. over 9 years ago on Michael Ramirez

   Nations often create their own nightmares. In fact this is something that is repeated over and over again throughout history. Perhaps it would be better suited to resolve the problem rather then argue over who created it.

6. over 9 years ago on Michael Ramirez

   Do you not find it funny that the majority of people who have chosen to not have their children Vaccinated are not only liberal, but are being defended by Conservatives under the aspect that it is their right to Choose? Or do you have your blinders so firmly in place that you can no longer see the hypocrisy that is evident on all sides?

7. over 9 years ago on Drew Sheneman

   The irony of this whole situation is that The liberals more or less did this to them selves. What makes it even funnier is that the Conservatives are being Crucified by the Media FOR defending the right of those very liberals who choose to not have their children vaccinated. It is a role reversal that is almost scary, funny, and depressing all at the same time.

8. over 9 years ago on Jeff Stahler

   6 years, no budget passed, never made it out of the Senate. Yet now, all of a sudden, it is an issue. I would dare ask people to put partisanship aside for just a moment, and ask them selves why this is.

9. over 9 years ago on Tom Toles

   +1, the best part is the two sheep looking at each other with contempt. Kind of like what I see here every day when reading comments….

10. over 9 years ago on Bob Gorrell

    I just find it ironic that the majority of those who have chosen to not have their children vaccinated against various diseases tend to be more liberal in nature… and the people defending their “right” to choose happen to be more conservative. This whole situation is like bizzaro world. Personally, I think common sense should dictate reality. And there are things that should be stamped out for the greater good of humanity. However, giving The government the ability to “force” you to do something… It is a slippery slope. Who is to say what may come down the road later, and with a precedent set, one could easily see how “Public health” could be manipulated into other “forced” changes.