Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller

Non Sequitur

Comments (61) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Superfrog

    Superfrog said, over 2 years ago

    Bordering on their own kind of bankruptcy. If you know what I mean.

  2. Meh~tdology
  3. Varnes

    Varnes said, over 2 years ago

    They also serve those who stand and hate…

  4. bluskies

    bluskies said, over 2 years ago

    Very inciteful strip, no?
    “now shake hands and come out swinging…”

  5. Bruno Zeigerts

    Bruno Zeigerts said, over 2 years ago

    How about a bar across the street with a sign:We reserved the right to refuse to serve bigots.

  6. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Sorry, we don’t allow bigots.
    We are quite elite that way.
    Diversity is our rule, unless it diverges from our rule.

  7. Proginoskes

    Proginoskes said, over 2 years ago

    Yo, Wiley. Did you hear? Brewer vetoed the Arizona bill.

  8. watmiwori

    watmiwori said, over 2 years ago

    The only good bigot is a dead bigot.

  9. Nabuquduriuzhur

    Nabuquduriuzhur said, over 2 years ago


    I wouldn’t trust anything from Raw Story. They are less accurate than NBC.

  10. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago


    What is the sound of one fist shaking?

  11. AKHenderson

    AKHenderson GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    It would be ironic if Bubba’s opened next to the ladies-only gym.

  12. Thirdguy

    Thirdguy said, over 2 years ago

    but……my kind, is a customer who pays cash!

  13. cdward

    cdward said, over 2 years ago

    @Proginoskes: it was indeed vetoed there. That doesn’t mean, however that A) it won’t come up again there and B) some other states aren’t considering it. Of course, I suppose that means my religious beliefs could allow me to refuse service to pretty much anyone from gun owners to Tea Party members and certainly Baptists (because I’m not a Baptist).

  14. ckmphipps

    ckmphipps said, over 2 years ago

    I doubt any storefront business with generic offerings would post such a sign. From what I’ve seen, it is only when a fair amount of active participation would be involved (decorating and delivering a custom gay-themed wedding cake would be on the minimum side while spending the day photographing a gay wedding would be on the maximum, for example) that there are any religious rights vs gay rights problems. In my opinion, again depending on the level of involvement that would be required, there should be some point where a business could say “I’m sorry. I’m uncomfortable with this. Here are the names of three of my competitors who might be able to serve your needs.” As a further thought experiment, suppose you wanted to hire a Muslim caterer for your wedding (gay or otherwise) since you like mid-eastern food. They would probably tell you that alcohol could not be present since it is against their religious beliefs to have anything to do with it. Would it then be okay to extort them into serving you by threatening to boycott not only them, but also any of their suppliers or customers? Before we all start ordering private businesses to violate their perceived religious beliefs, we should take note that the unintended consequences could eventually come back to haunt us.
    Sorry if this is rambling, but it’s not even 6 AM, yet.

  15. Puddlesplatt McLearn

    Puddlesplatt McLearn said, over 2 years ago

    business is gonna be slow, or none at all…

  16. Load 15 more comments. | Load the rest (46).