Non Sequitur is Wiley Miller's wry look at the absurdities of everyday life. A hit with fans of all ages, the strip is syndicated in more than 700 newspapers. Non Sequitur has received four National Cartoonists Society divisional awards, the most prestigious in cartooning. It is the only comic strip to win the coveted award in its first year of syndication and the only one to ever win in both the best comic strip and best comic panel categories.
This hilarious creation is not only creative but also clever. It tackles current cultural issues such as politics, celebrities, male-female relations, materialistic desires and society's obsession with weight. Non Sequitur will have you laughing at the controversy of everyday life.
Collectible Prints:
Collectible Prints are always available for all editions. Original art is available on a first-come, first-served basis. Just contact Wiley Miller for either.
Information on Non Sequitur original art: Upon availability, the original art sells for $375 for a daily edition, and $500 for a Sunday edition.
All original art, including most Sunday editions, are in black & white line art (color in newspapers is done in a separate process).
Information on prints:
Prints are available (black and white only) for any edition of Non Sequitur for $75 each.
Most Sunday editions are available in color prints for $150 each.
All prints are on high quality, 11" x 14" cardstock, suitable for framing.
If you would like to have either a print or original personally inscribed, please include a note indicating who it is to inscribed for. Otherwise, the work will NOT be signed.
© Wiley - All Rights Reserved.
New Adventures of Queen Victoria by Pab Sungenis
The Norm Classics by Michael Jantze
Comments (37) (Please sign in to comment)
Dogsniff
said, 11 months ago
Practice makes perfect.
fear-ciuil said, 11 months ago
Shouldn’t the guy demanding the money be the one in the back? If this refers to what I think it refers to, anyway….
Ron Gee said, 11 months ago
No, the guy in front is correct, because the guy in back is the one at fault and would be liable for damages.
fear-ciuil said, 11 months ago
@Ron Gee
That’s the point. If this is referring to what I think it’s referring to, the at-fault party—or, at least, someone who claimed to represent the at-fault party—is the one demanding $20,000.
massha said, 11 months ago
fear-ciuil – so you think it’s a take on that lawyer who sued Oatmeal?
Rockngolfer said, 11 months ago
The fraud of causing an accident on purpose to make it look like the victim did it involves two vehicles, one to slam on brakes and one to box in the victim.
Tampa, FL is #1 in the nation for this fraud.
Varnes said, 11 months ago
$20,000? The car’s only worth $4,000!
Ice Hole
said, 11 months ago
Tailgate me really close, I’ll slam my breaks..!
Varnes said, 11 months ago
I brake for tailgaters….
olfart said, 11 months ago
I brake for no apparent reason.
Amar7605 said, 11 months ago
You nailed it on the head. This is why fundamentally I don’t like the practice of arbitration in law.
Respectful Troll said, 11 months ago
Hello Neighbors,
Heard Arlo Guthrie say – roughly- When a farmer robs a bank, police, lawyers, & all sorts of other folks get involved, but when a bank robs a farmer- not as many folk seem to care.
Seemed to apply here.
Respectfully,
C.
stripseeker said, 11 months ago
@Downs
Love your calm and peaceful posts,addressing us as neighbors. Your point is well taken.
However, the likely follow-up here would be for the guy with the license to practice law to take the out-of court settlement, and then sue.
bgby4884 said, 11 months ago
And seeing as how around 80% of the politicians are lawyers, guess who the laws favor.
Svén Svénsøn
said, 11 months ago
@Respectful Troll
Very true!