Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller

Non Sequitur

Comments (37) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Sharon1942

    Sharon1942 said, over 7 years ago

    Now we know what Al Gore is!

  2. pouncingtiger

    pouncingtiger said, over 7 years ago

    The female perrogative

  3. Leonardeuler

    Leonardeuler said, over 7 years ago

    That sounds like an obscure sort of phylosophy.

  4. johnparadox

    johnparadox said, over 7 years ago

    I thought that was called ‘Intelligent Design”

  5. Lunatic

    Lunatic said, over 7 years ago

    Hmm, exact same job description as “theist”.

  6. Akenta

    Akenta said, over 7 years ago

    It will let her apply her math skills.

  7. rlgrant

    rlgrant said, over 7 years ago

    johnparadox, it will be too late, but I will still wave to you from across the abyss.

  8. The Saccharine-Free Bakery

    The Saccharine-Free Bakery said, over 7 years ago

    Lucy should know better than to ask open-ended questions like that…. (plus I love her oh-no-here-we-go-again face in the 3rd panel!)

  9. prasrinivara

    prasrinivara GoComics PRO Member said, over 7 years ago

    Eh, I thought Al Gore had a monopoly on that.

  10. Submachine

    Submachine said, over 7 years ago

    Al Gore is the foremost authority .

  11. txjak

    txjak said, over 7 years ago

    Hey, this isn’t a new science, it’s what creation scientists have been doing all along.

  12. Roy Engelbrecht

    Roy Engelbrecht GoComics PRO Member said, over 7 years ago

    The only thing missing to Danea’s notion is that when events prove you wrong, you have no accountability ! Yeah, that’s Al Gore alright

  13. Vinny Slagle

    Vinny Slagle said, over 7 years ago

    Whenever Danae grows up to be a pre-conceptual scientist, she should be competed with others for being a success.

  14. plus4

    plus4 said, over 7 years ago

    johnparadox / txjak: You should take a look at Answers in Genesis’ weekly comments on recent news stories, wherein they easily & factually expose the “pre-conceptuality” of evolutionary “scientists.” And don’t forget that the reason there even *is* an ID movement is because some scientists have had enough of evolutionists’ “pre-conceptuality” getting in the way of real discovery.

  15. Dutchboy1

    Dutchboy1 said, over 7 years ago

    Isn’t this a repeat from several months ago? I remember because I made a comment about evolution being just like that and all the evolutionists went bananas and lost their minds. And plus4, you’re absolutely right. There is a definite bias in the science community. They are willing to consider any possibility, no matter how goofy, as long as it has nothing to do with GOD. I even heard one ‘researcher’ say that the intelligent way that life works (a point that he didn’t dispute) is because it’s possible that ALIENS from another world put life on Earth, but he ABSOLUTELY REFUSED to even consider the possibility that GOD did this. Granted, religion in general had done a pretty poor job of presenting who GOD is, but if a scientist refuses to even consider any possibility, whatever it may be, because he or she doesn’t like it, it invalidates all his or her work from that point on: as in “what OTHER possibilities is he not willing to even consider because he doesn’t like them, that is going to bias his research?”

  16. Load the rest of the comments (22).