Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller

Non Sequitur

Recommended

Comments (39) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Sharon1942

    Sharon1942 said, almost 4 years ago

    Now we know what Al Gore is!

  2. Baslim the begger

    Baslim the begger said, almost 4 years ago

    Or George W Bush and Dick Cheney

  3. pouncingtiger

    pouncingtiger said, almost 4 years ago

    The female perrogative

  4. Leonardeuler

    Leonardeuler said, almost 4 years ago

    That sounds like an obscure sort of phylosophy.

  5. johnparadox

    johnparadox said, almost 4 years ago

    I thought that was called ‘Intelligent Design”

  6. Lunatic

    Lunatic said, almost 4 years ago

    Hmm, exact same job description as “theist”.

  7. Akenta

    Akenta said, almost 4 years ago

    It will let her apply her math skills.

  8. rlgrant

    rlgrant said, almost 4 years ago

    johnparadox, it will be too late, but I will still wave to you from across the abyss.

  9. Astute Social Observer

    Astute Social Observer said, almost 4 years ago

    Lucy should know better than to ask open-ended questions like that…. (plus I love her oh-no-here-we-go-again face in the 3rd panel!)

  10. prasrinivara

    prasrinivara said, almost 4 years ago

    Eh, I thought Al Gore had a monopoly on that.

  11. Submachine

    Submachine said, almost 4 years ago

    Al Gore is the foremost authority .

  12. txjak

    txjak said, almost 4 years ago

    Hey, this isn’t a new science, it’s what creation scientists have been doing all along.

  13. Roy Engelbrecht

    Roy Engelbrecht said, almost 4 years ago

    The only thing missing to Danea’s notion is that when events prove you wrong, you have no accountability ! Yeah, that’s Al Gore alright

  14. Wildmustang1262

    Wildmustang1262 said, almost 4 years ago

    Whenever Danae grows up to be a pre-conceptual scientist, she should be competed with others for being a success.

  15. plus4

    plus4 said, almost 4 years ago

    johnparadox / txjak: You should take a look at Answers in Genesis’ weekly comments on recent news stories, wherein they easily & factually expose the “pre-conceptuality” of evolutionary “scientists.” And don’t forget that the reason there even *is* an ID movement is because some scientists have had enough of evolutionists’ “pre-conceptuality” getting in the way of real discovery.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (24).