Mike Luckovich by Mike Luckovich

Mike Luckovich

Comments (24) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ARodney

    ARodney said, almost 2 years ago

    What a neanderthal. He’s been getting worse, too. I loved Kagan’s comments, she’s the smartest one on the bench. Certainly the wittiest.

  2. davefrompaterson

    davefrompaterson said, almost 2 years ago

    what i liked is the guy who said he is worried about the fate of 37,000 children in gay families. he is not worried about all the rest of the children in one parent families or two fighting parent families. how many would that be?

  3. Darsan54

    Darsan54 said, almost 2 years ago


    Whoa, don’t be insulting neanderthals. They are way higher on the evolutionary ladder than Scalia.

  4. Darsan54

    Darsan54 said, almost 2 years ago


    No, probably just objective observations.

  5. echoraven

    echoraven said, almost 2 years ago


    No it should be:
    “Grow up and let them marry, THEN mind your own business”

  6. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, almost 2 years ago


    No, it should be that government restrictions on the personal life of consenting adults who are American citizens, especially those from a specific religious motivation, should be struck down. If they took American freedoms as seriously as they took the 2nd amendment, they would strike down DOMA instantly.

  7. wbr

    wbr said, almost 2 years ago

    if 2 or more competent adults want to hook up that is their business but what i object to is they expecting me to subsidize them. the 1st case bho decide not to enforce doma was a case involving inheritance tax on the estate of a donor

  8. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    Scalia is becoming a poster boy for term limits on the SCOTUS, or at least reading in the Constitution where it states that appointments are for a term “while on good behavior” and that impeachment IS possible, though incredibly rare.

  9. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, almost 2 years ago

    the 14th amendment makes it a federal issue. and so long as “married” couples have more rights than other couples UNDER THE LAW, there is a federal equal protection issue here.

  10. Gary McSpook

    Gary McSpook said, almost 2 years ago


    What a dirty and pointless little dig.
    Is this your idea of discussion on a higher level?
    Or are you just projecting your own failings onto others?

  11. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago


    That would be fine if there were not Federal Tax issues involved…not to mention the “Equal Protection” Clause of the U.S. Constitution…

  12. mikefive

    mikefive said, almost 2 years ago


    How did you determine that “the guy” was not worried about the “all of the rest of the children.”

  13. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, almost 2 years ago


    Under the equal protection clause of the US Constitution in amendment 14, gays should be allowed to have “Civil Unions” with the same “Civil” rights as married heterosexuals.

    At the same time, under the 1 St amendment with its implied separation of religious churches from the civil laws of the US Constitution, no governmental agency in either the federal government or more local governments has the civil “Right” to force any church to sanctify marriages for anyone but heterosexuals. You do not have to be either a constitutional lawyer or even a Supreme Court Justice to be able to read and so interpret the US Constitution.

    And YES people, it is really that simple!!

  14. JoeCoolLives

    JoeCoolLives said, almost 2 years ago


    DOMA made it a federal issue…DOMA is a federal law.

  15. pirate227

    pirate227 said, almost 2 years ago


    Wrong, as usual. Imagine if it was left up to the states to decide to “allow” interracial marriage.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (9).