Michael Ramirez by Michael Ramirez

Michael Ramirez

Comments (31) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Jeff T

    Jeff T said, about 3 years ago

    How many times will Ramirez reference this story? If he’s going to keep rehashing it, at least do something funny with it.

  2. Chillbilly

    Chillbilly said, about 3 years ago

    YEAH. He should be focusing on important things like Fast & Furious.

  3. bgarner

    bgarner said, about 3 years ago

    That’s supposed to be Obama? It looks like Mr. Ramirez was tripping on something when he drew this one. Someone should tell him that the ears are usually positioned above the shoulders.

  4. Chillbilly

    Chillbilly said, about 3 years ago

    When even “Fox and Friends” doesn’t believe the extremist right-wing conspiracies, you KNOW it’s BS.

  5. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, about 3 years ago

    The newest info on Benghazi is an admitted opinion made by a state department official. I suppose this cartoon makes Mr. Ramirez popular with his base, but with information still being collected, I wish he would address some of the other issues that are definitely effecting our nation and its foreign policy.
    As I read some of the comments above, I am thinking about the various and conflicting reports I hear and read on the media. The truthiness on this topic seems to be more prevalent than any straightforward facts.
    @ ScottPM – the efforts of Republican controlled statehouses to limit voting among those who traditionally vote Democrat makes your comment that Dems only want power at everybody else’s expense farcical. Despite SCOTUS decisions giving access to voting to students at out of state colleges, Ohio and North Carolina are working to make it harder for students to vote at the colleges where they attend, and other states are making access to the polls more limited, or requiring specific types of paperwork.
    The party you defending is working to make it harder for honest americans to vote, but easy for honest americans to buy guns. Sadly, they are making it easy for dishonest americans to buy guns as well.
    Why are gun rights more precious than voting rights, Scott?
    Respectfully,
    C.

  6. d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release

    d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release said, about 3 years ago

    I wish you cons would have shown this much vim and vigor when we invaded Iraq which resulted in:


    4,000 dead American Soldiers


    33,000 wounded American Soldiers


    100,000 Iraqi civillian deaths


    $1 billion dollars of cold hard cash that has yet to be accounted for.


    Non-Existent WMDs


    And this was before Obama took office.

  7. jack75287

    jack75287 said, about 3 years ago

    How many died in Watergate?

  8. warjoski

    warjoski GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    @bgarner

    He’s likening him to Richard Nixon. In a lot of political cartoons, Nixon was drawn stoop shouldered, head down low like that.

  9. warjoski

    warjoski GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    @Respectful Troll

    You can secure voting rights with guns if need be. The reverse is not necessarily true. I’m not saying I agree violence as an answer. It seldom is. But I can’t blame people for being leery of the situation that is developing: that is the government having all the weaponry and the citizenry having none. Particularly as both parties, and yes I said both parties, are falling more and more under the control of their fringe elements. Honestly, I can’t blame gun nuts for stocking up.

  10. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, about 3 years ago

    It seems apparent that many posters believe that the degree of outrageousness of presidential action is different if the president is a democrat or a republican. I submit that it’s the same, regardless of political party. Until we recognize that there is incompetence, lack of leadership, and an unwillingness to get along on both sides of the aisle, all we do is trade insults. At least some of us are getting good at it.

  11. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, about 3 years ago

    “Impeach now.”

    You want Biden for president?

  12. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, about 3 years ago

    “Aren’t you in the least upset that your President lied and covered up facts to mislead you?”

    And where were you between 2001 and 2009?

  13. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, about 3 years ago

    I see you still haven’t looked up the definition of socialism. That’s okay; you’re not the only one.

  14. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, about 3 years ago

    You know what’s interesting? No matter how much Obama screws up, no one has the guts to say how much better Mitt Romney would have done under the circumstances. I guess this is a continuation of the theme: I never met a Romney supporter, just an Obama-hater.

  15. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, about 3 years ago

    Jeff T said, about 7 hours ago
    “How many times will Ramirez reference this story? If he’s going to keep rehashing it, at least do something funny with it.”
    -
    Ramirez, as does all Americans who believe in Justice, will refererence this scandal as long as it takes to get the full and honest accounting completed.
    -
    the President, Sec’y State and Sec’y Defense did a stonewall of this tragic news of 4 murdered Americans at Benghazi.
    the lapdog MSM helped the COVER-UP, and false narrative the White House set up from day one, 9/11/12.
    -
    Unanswered Questions may start to get answers Wednesday 5/8/13 in the House committee hearing, from officials who were gagged by Hillary and Obama, under threat of career punishment. There are many unanswered questions:
    where was Obama and Hillary during the 9 hour attacks?
    Why were our Special Ops teams not sent? Why was the non-response chosen for political reasons over and above the safety of Americans left alone (all other foreign officials pulled out beforehand) and the duty to attempt rescue.
    -
    Why did the Obama leaders pretend for 7 or 8 days that the attack was by protestors of a video? “protestors with military grade weapons”? Why did the MSM help stonewall—-was it to protect O’s re-election?

  16. Load the rest of the comments (16).