Whether the emails were classified or not, they were destroyed while under congressional subpoena. That is called contempt of congress. Since the statute of limitations had not yet elapsed, it would have been perfectly legal for DOJ to charge her in early 2016. Trump felt it would lower the US into banana republic territory to charge her. I happen to agree with that. Dems, however, seem to have no compunction over lowering the US into banana republic status.
Congress subpoened Clinton’s emails. Subsequent to the subpoena, the emails were deleted. Whether they were personal or not is irrelevant since they were on her government email account. Feel free to do some research to verify these facts.
Under the judcical system in place at that time, a conviction had to be preceded by a prosecution. Trump, in a spirit of bipartisanship, naively directed the DOJ to not prosecute.
The Iran agreement had no more force of law than Trump’s “remain in Mexico” policy. Whether either policy was good for the US is debatable. What is not debatable is that any succeeding President had the constitutional authority to rescind either or both policies.
Whether the emails were classified or not, they were destroyed while under congressional subpoena. That is called contempt of congress. Since the statute of limitations had not yet elapsed, it would have been perfectly legal for DOJ to charge her in early 2016. Trump felt it would lower the US into banana republic territory to charge her. I happen to agree with that. Dems, however, seem to have no compunction over lowering the US into banana republic status.
No whining, just stating facts.