Under the judcical system in place at that time, a conviction had to be preceded by a prosecution. Trump, in a spirit of bipartisanship, naively directed the DOJ to not prosecute.
The Iran agreement had no more force of law than Trump’s “remain in Mexico” policy. Whether either policy was good for the US is debatable. What is not debatable is that any succeeding President had the constitutional authority to rescind either or both policies.
Yes or no would not explain why it is current. If someone doesn’t seem to understand something, a complete answer can only help, while an incomplete answer might not help at all.
Why are you so focused on this rather insignificant question? Are you afraid someone might see the truth?
Under the judcical system in place at that time, a conviction had to be preceded by a prosecution. Trump, in a spirit of bipartisanship, naively directed the DOJ to not prosecute.