Actually, an osprey is a lot closer to an eagle than a hawk. Still, the point is that no official source spells “osprey” as “s-e-a-h-a-w-k.”
But if we’re going after NFL names, there is no such thing as a “Brown” or a “Steeler.” And “Saints” most certainly begs a question, and “Packers” is pretty much non-sensical — though inspired.
Engineering is full of instances of master-slave relationships among components and systems. Will they have to change to PC-correct dominant-submissive? And why is it that that would be somehow better?
I remember when Shugart Associates Serial Interface was new. SASI. Great. But the mavens at the IEEE who were willing to declare it an industry standard weren’t going to accept it under the name of a particular company. So, Shugart renamed it the “Small Computer Serial Interface” and SCSI was born.
Of course, they tried to make out that it was still pronounced “sassy.” Yeah, right.
Gif with a hard G it is. Deal with it, the people have spoken. One guy tried to explain to me that it has to be a soft g because every word that starts with “gi” has a soft-g pronunciation. As I pointed out, yeah, just like girl and gift. Or girth. Or (related term here) girdle. Giving it some thought, I’m sure you can come up with a few of your own.
Actually, an osprey is a lot closer to an eagle than a hawk. Still, the point is that no official source spells “osprey” as “s-e-a-h-a-w-k.”
But if we’re going after NFL names, there is no such thing as a “Brown” or a “Steeler.” And “Saints” most certainly begs a question, and “Packers” is pretty much non-sensical — though inspired.