Maybe dude doesn’t recognize that he’s arguing for a chaotic performance. Who’d want to hear the candidates’ positions on topics Americans deem to be important when we can have more performative politics, right? Quite a middle school position.
Personally, I will not be disappointed if he is found not guilty (although the bribe scenario, if there was evidence, would change my mind). The NY case was always the weakest, but from what I’ve read the evidence certainly seems to be there for conviction.
However, I’m not so invested in the result that I’ll lose any sleep over it. If that does happen, we can then watch the MAGA crowd’s respect for the judicial system do a 180.
The book I’m reading now, “The Coddling of the American Mind” (Lukianoff & Haidt) touches on this. He even changed the work schedule in the House and advised his caucus to not buy homes in DC. Fly in and out so there would be no intermixing with the Democrats.
I knew of his divisive nature before, but I’m learning more & more the particulars of his disgusting actions.
That’s not one I’m saying. The right uses the “fleeing CA” as if ALL are fleeing CA. I do not believe in absolutes like that, so it was a simple counter argument to that broad generalization.
More name calling from an Economic illiterate? Shocking. Showing that you can’t understand a joke to students frustrated with Economics is par for the course from you. Once again, I’m shocked; shocked I tell ya.
Free lesson for you: you see there are many schools of thought in Economics, then when circumstances prove one side or other to be correct, the crowing of their infallibility begins.