ViewsAmerica by CartoonArts International for November 27, 2009

  1. 100 2208
    parkersinthehouse  over 12 years ago

    if the humane and brilliant bush/cheney/rice triplets had planned (and garnered un sanction) and armed our soldiers with better gear and vehicles with better armor, and if they had been honest in the first place and attacked the right target, we would be clean and out

     •  Reply
  2. 300px debs campaign
    BoxCar66  over 12 years ago

    Clinton said he would not authorize dropping a bomb on Ben Laden because there may be a Saudi Arabian there. Hell, they are all Saudi Arabians. So the fuel air bomb sounds like a good plan to me.

     •  Reply
  3. Soldier  edit
    Kosher71  over 12 years ago

    All is fair in love and war .

     •  Reply
  4. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 12 years ago

    If we’d gone after ONLY the camps and bin Laden, it would have been brief. The Taliban turned down the oil pipeline project, so had to go.

    Clinton DID authorize bombing the camps, and any Saudi expats in the camps, but the missiles missed the targets. Those “precision guided” missiles even landed in the wrong country. The same thing happened in the second Iraq fiasco, as when reporters comfortably ensconced OUTSIDE Iraq ducked an incoming “scud” that was actually an errant cruise missile.

     •  Reply
  5. Durak ukraine
    Durak Premium Member over 12 years ago

    Doc Canuck - if they’re there they aren’t innocent. They’re there supporting the mission and providing aid and comfort to our enemy. My family was in similar position when we were stationed in Wurzburg, Germany. We always understood that they were targets, just as those of us in uniform were. It was a chance we took. If they’re on a valid military target it’s the chance they take and the choice they make. Send ‘em to Allah.

     •  Reply
  6. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 12 years ago

    Under the Cheney/Rumsfeld plan, if it moved= military target, standing building=military target, school= military target, wedding=military target, etc.

    We tried that in ‘Nam, and well, the results are there.

    Smarter is to NOT blow them up before you ask questions, but we’ve already gone there. NOW the much harder job is to convince them we will STOP blowing up their children, and only go after the very small number of “bad guys” we were after in the first place.

    Of course, they’ve already seen thousands of times that we consider everyone a “bad guy”, so if in their shoes, would YOU believe us?

    A very tough sell indeed.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From ViewsAmerica