Your implication is that comparing Obama to Hitler is a reasonable, defensible argument.
Name-calling is easy. I can call you a green-headed homo-narcissist. That was easy. I can compare you to Pope Paul V. Not difficult either.
Coming up with ideas, defending them, explaining why, other than knee-jerk loserism, you disagree with the ideas emerging from others, that’s difficult. Until we see anything that can be called intelligent discourse from either of you, don’t go thinking your smarter than anyone else here.
Your implication is that comparing Obama to Hitler is a reasonable, defensible argument.
Name-calling is easy. I can call you a green-headed homo-narcissist. That was easy. I can compare you to Pope Paul V. Not difficult either.
Coming up with ideas, defending them, explaining why, other than knee-jerk loserism, you disagree with the ideas emerging from others, that’s difficult. Until we see anything that can be called intelligent discourse from either of you, don’t go thinking your smarter than anyone else here.