Stuart Carlson for May 31, 2016

California matters, but most likely this will all be matter of time before this turns to a White House race between Trump and Clinton (and some charming centrist?) Instead of the primary battle (as pictured here)

At least he’s biting the left leg.

Bernie’s odds have been stable for a while now.http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2016/winnerhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11457970/If-you-want-to-know-who-will-win-the-election-ask-a-gambler.html

I wish the FBI would hurry up and indict her.Sanders would be a much better president, and he is honest.He Would be winning if the DNC were Not throwing the game.

It is amazing how many local voters have chosen Ms.Clinton (the one that has the Billy Baggage and his attached interview tent).

It seems that the same numbers have shown up to voter for Mr. Sanders.In the beginning, Sanders was assigned to receive 20% of primary voting Delegates of all states and Clinton would receive 80%. Well, it appears that the Debbie Whats-her-name Schultz has lost the memo.

There are threats that if Sanders drops out of the race, no one will vote for Clinton. Zero is a big number in the D.C. Belt-way.

While Bernie may hold the public’s hearts, Clinton still has the numbers. Trump should self destruct.